chrisd
Major Champion
Ever thought that they were not there because no one needed them.
Food banks would have been a Godsend as far back as I can remember for some
Ever thought that they were not there because no one needed them.
Food banks would have been a Godsend as far back as I can remember for some
For the unemployed yes.........not for the employed
Rubbish! ........ Not everyone was paid a living wage back in the 1950's and 60's when benefits were very restricted and often means tested
I think pro rata the working poor were a lot better off in the 50/60's than they are now.
Remember they had unions in those days.
I wasn't around back then at all, on what basis do you judge this? Without being obtuse, but surely you were too young to judge back then as to what was really happening? (assuming you're less than 80?).I think pro rata the working poor were a lot better off in the 50/60's than they are now.
Remember they had unions in those days.
Can you define 'we' please.
I would imagine they do not include the hard working families who are sadly forced to use food banks.
That would be the food banks that no one used 5 years ago.
Thats because they wernt there. If food banks were available at any time in the past people would have used them.
I wasn't around back then at all, on what basis do you judge this? Without being obtuse, but surely you were too young to judge back then as to what was really happening? (assuming you're less than 80?).
Not so much of the 80 !!
I was born 1952 and working at 15 as were many of us. Both the unemployed and the working poor had it tough compared to the 80's and onwards. My mother bought up 5 of us single handed, worked as best she could and would have benefited greatly from food banks
Forgive me, I forgot the youngerworking age as was thinking of 25, before someone could really properly assess the situation in somewhere more than their own town.
Hardships! Give me a break, most people in this country don't have any idea of what real hardship is like.
I asked you a question recently that you never replied to. I ask you again: If we had a Labour Government and all read the Guardian would we be living the life of Riley?
Presumably you didn't live through those times!
I wonder what Labour will do if Corbyn gets as big a first vote as they predict.
Interesting times ahead.
Obviously we only knew what we could see ourselves, televisions, for those that had them, were black and white, no internet or phones so gauging how life was in other parts of the country was almost impossible. I had a difficult time as a youngster but by no means as hard as some. I remember in winter going to bed when it got dark as we didn't have any money for the electric meter, or having bread and jam for dinner, without butter, as there wasn't money to buy anything by the end of the week. I used to have to put cardboard in my jumble sale shoes once they had a hole in the sole so I didn't get too wet and before my next secondhand pair arrived!
It was tough but, hey, I didn't come to any harm and did ok
I Don't see anything 'interesting' ahead, Labour we be unelectable and Conservatives will win the next election - life as it should be!
I support Corbyn because although I now have a good job and an excellent income, I came from a council house, benefitted from free education, a student grant to go to Uni and unlike many Tories, I do not think that the ladder should be pulled up behind me now. I also support a publicly owned NHS unlike the current pseudo-marketised version which is wasting loads of public money which could be spent on actual healthcare.
I also do not like the war on welfare recipients and immigrants which is a mostly a distraction for the masses away from the wealthy who escaped the financial crash scot free and are now back to making loads more from such self-serving initiatives as the sale of RBS shares by their mate George (real name: Gideon, by the way), as well as an ideological crusade.
If that causes a split in Labour and the neo-Blairites break off and clear off, so be it.