Tashyboy
Please don’t ask to see my tatts 👍
Currently letting it all hang out on Cala Mondrago beach. Its reminds me of Hunstanton. The beach not the course.
Not.
Not.
Both. I've booked reviews in advance and also played 'unannounced' as a guest or in opens.
Edit: I'm reviewing 5 courses next week so I'll let you know how I get on.
I have “mystery shopped†8 courses already this year for review purposes. However, I have also contacted a few to play as a reviewer.
Luckily for me, I haven’t noticed a major difference as all the clubs have been welcoming and friendly irrespective of knowing I was a reviewer.
Do You pay full whack?
Do You pay full whack?
How do you define full whack? Twilight, Open fee, two for one on Monday afternoons, society rates, members guest rates, Golfnow, or what the full ticket price is on the day in the pro shop? Does anyone pay this?
I doubt you get a special rate as a reviewer.
Think the silence in the replies, probably answers that question.
Not sure if that is a problem in itself tho, again it could change the experience as the club must at that stage know that a reviewer is there(which personally I think the club should not know). Myself I tend to read reviews from a number of sources rather than just trust one source such as GM.
How do you define full whack? Twilight, Open fee, two for one on Monday afternoons, society rates, members guest rates, Golfnow, or what the full ticket price is on the day in the pro shop? Does anyone pay this?
I doubt you get a special rate as a reviewer.
Do You pay full whack?
As mentioned previously the welcome and staff form only a small part of the process. The design, test, condition and presentation of the course forms the bulk of the review and I doubt that any course will have the inclination or ability to change those for a reviewers planned visit.To give an honest review, surely you just need to just book a tee time and let the day take care of its self??
If you're getting an audit at work, you are going to try and prepare for it and get ahead of the game, i'm sure golf clubs aren't that naive not to try and do a bit 'extra' if their course is getting reviewed......
As mentioned previously the welcome and staff form only a small part of the process. The design, test, condition and presentation of the course forms the bulk of the review and I doubt that any course will have the inclination or ability to change those for a reviewers planned visit.
As mentioned previously the welcome and staff form only a small part of the process. The design, test, condition and presentation of the course forms the bulk of the review and I doubt that any course will have the inclination or ability to change those for a reviewers planned visit.
No mag etc is going to come out and say club x was awful and a dump no more than they will rip in to the latest TM driver release. It's the circle of life 😉Design, test, condition and presentation should be all its about and that is why golf course reviews are nonsense.
It's a review of the course not the club.
Anyway I don't want to take this further off track. Hopefully whoever next plays Hunstanton gives us their views. Never played it and to be honest it's never been on my radar either.
It's a review of the course not the club.
Think the silence in the replies, probably answers that question.
Not sure if that is a problem in itself tho, again it could change the experience as the club must at that stage know that a reviewer is there(which personally I think the club should not know). Myself I tend to read reviews from a number of sources rather than just trust one source such as GM.
"Hi, I'm here to review the course for a golf magazine."
Let me think about how that is going to influence the reception, courtesy etc etc.