Foxholer
Blackballed
If we receive "far more" in that area than we contribute then in other areas we have to receive far less than we contribute otherwise we wouldn't have a nett contribution of 10, 12 or 14 billion per year - or whatever the actual figure is.
You can't offset the extra we get for science against our nett contribution and say it's a good thing without admitting also that the extra 2 billion we pay in compared to what we get back for the environment is a bad thing. (2 billion and environment were plucked from mid air as an example rather than being based on actual figures)
Happy to admit/agree with the above! However, Scientific Research is one of UK's particular talents, which would be greatly diminished by withdrawal from EU. The nett contribution merely reflects the better position the UK economy is in than SOME other EU members. The overall UK contribution, from (old) figures I'v seen is actually one of the lowest per capita contributions!