jdpjamesp
Q-School Graduate
True, but we act as a part of the EU?
Last line has it in one.Does anyone think that being in the EU helps us in terms of reducing our visibility as a target for terrorist attacks? If we're in the EU then there are some nice meaty targets in places like Belgium and France that they can target and be seen to be hitting the EU who are causing trouble for them. If we're not in the EU then suddenly our actions in places like Syria become the actions of Britain, not the EU, and therefore London gets a big red X painted on it.
Or am I just being naive?
True, but we act as a part of the EU?
I stand corrected. As you were.We act as part of the UN and NATO not EU
Of course I am prepared to meet the difference. Where do you think the money the EU uses comes from?
The issue being that this £10bn (or whatever it is) funding gap is suddenly being promised to 101 different areas.
That's not what I meant, forget the funding gap. We already pay money into the EU every week and part of that money is currently being put into research and development.
So where are all the research bodies/institutions supporting the case for Brexit and stating that they are confident that their research programmes won't be affected or stating that they will be happy to accommodate any reduction in funding. Surely with many in the Science and Research community coming out stating the case for staying and the risks of leaving - the equivalent community in the Brexit camp will be making their point - or is it that that community just does not exist, and in that resounding silence is the Remain case made for Scientific Research?
Many ? Really ?
Who exactly because I haven't heard anyone bar that link you put up ?
I think I kicked off this whole sorry episode about science funding about 3 thousand posts back saying Hawking and 150 Royal Society Scientists, including 3 Nobel laureates and The Astronomer Royal, wrote a letter to The Times saying they wanted us to stay in. Not sure if that counts as 'many' in the fact based proof world we live in on this forum. Possibly it's 'quite a few', certainly 'a decent number' and I'd go as far as saying more than 'a handful' .
Sorry but I do not know each of their names through before you ask for that. The ghost of Magnus Pyke and Patrick Moore may have been in there, but I can't confirm that. Also possibly Nina from Nina and the Neurons on CBBC? Doc from Back to the Future?? The 2 nerdy lads who created Kelly LeBrock in Weird Science? Sorry, I'm struggling here.
Maybe because in the grand scheme of things is not a big vote swinger for peopleThankyou HK - the thing about the statements by this specific scientific community is that the Brexiteers respnse to it seems to me to be symptomatic of the state of play. Remain supporters try and state a case and highlight risks - Brexiteers dismiss it as being from a vested-interest; part of Remain campaign; irrelevant or scaremongering, and that is it.
So here we have it - a sizeable body from the scientific community state the case - and what do Brexit do? They question whether the scientific body is 'big' or 'representative'
Truth is - it doesn't really matter - because other than from a few disparate individuals I am not hearing from an equivalent body supporting the Brexit case.
Thankyou HK - the thing about the statements by this specific scientific community is that the Brexiteers respnse to it seems to me to be symptomatic of the state of play. Remain supporters try and state a case and highlight risks - Brexiteers dismiss it as being from a vested-interest; part of Remain campaign; irrelevant or scaremongering, and that is it.
So here we have it - a sizeable body from the scientific community state the case - and what do Brexit do? They question whether the scientific body is 'big' or 'representative'
Truth is - it doesn't really matter - because other than from a few disparate individuals I am not hearing from an equivalent body supporting the Brexit case.
Irrespective of all the 'expert' opinions being voiced...
Absolutely no one knows, for sure, what will happen irrespective of the eventual outcome of the vote...
So you prefer 'inexpert' opinions?
They'll be just as 'useful' as the 'expert' ones as to what will happen post referendum...
Even Chucka Ummunna a big In campaigner admitted on the politics show that nobody really knows what the impact on leaving would be. Some truth from a politician, things are looking up.
So where are all the research bodies/institutions supporting the case for Brexit and stating that they are confident that their research programmes won't be affected or stating that they will be happy to accommodate any reduction in funding. Surely with many in the Science and Research community coming out stating the case for staying and the risks of leaving - the equivalent community in the Brexit camp will be making their point - or is it that that community just does not exist, and in that resounding silence is the Remain case made for Scientific Research?
That's my reason for staying as no one has got a scubby what the impact will be if we leave.
Bit like someone rings me up and says I've got this great job for you at Company X only snag I'll tell you when you start what you are doing or how much you'll get paid. Would I leave my current role even if it was crap for this. Unlikely.