Imurg
The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
Well let's hope we don't get fooled again
You better you bet....:clap:
Well let's hope we don't get fooled again
You better you bet....:clap:
So you still believe that it is a FACT that there has always been a plan for Brexit and that the government has been following it assiduously. Got any evidence of that?
Please tell me where I said that?
..............
Very well. Continue stating your opinion as fact, your call.
Fact.....
A thing that is known or proved to be true.
Please tell me where I said that?
Barnier's speech this afternoon has rejected May's Chequers Plan still under discussion and to be 'agreed' by Cabinet - This is before its written and/or published!!
Barnier's stance is to reject anything and everything - I don't know why we bother trying to negotiate as he simply refuses to accept the UK is leaving. This stance was predicted by the ex-Greek finance minister in his book and I'm beginning to think he was spot on.
Perhaps YOU should also state where SILH actually stated that his OPINION was FACT
A bit of 'consistency' would not go amiss imo!
Nor would the concept of 'play the argument, not the man'! (Again...imo!).
Perhaps YOU should also state where SILH actually stated that his OPINION was FACT
A bit of 'consistency' would not go amiss imo!
Nor would the concept of 'play the argument, not the man'! (Again...imo!).
Did you read post no.39?
You are hardly one to comment on punctuation! At least mine is grammatically correct. Why do you use 3 full-stops instead of the 'proper' mark?Are you the referee or forum Police on the discussion between Hogie and Bobmac, or are you being your usual pedantic self...
BTW, Nice to see only two exclamation marks for a change, although it was a very short post. Keep it up...
You are hardly one to comment on punctuation! At least mine is grammatically correct. Why do you use 3 full-stops instead of the 'proper' mark?
Well, you’ve now confirmed the obvious, you’re thick.
3 full stops are called an ellipsis. It’s done to let the reader understand the contextual manner of the sentence, and for them to fill in the obvious gaps.
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
Im struggling to stop laughing at you... nice one Foxy.
Don’t forget to wipe the egg off your face.
Let be honest with ourselves
It was also going to be a long and complex process for the UK to leave the EU and ensure that we don’t screw ourselves over and make sure that we get the best deal possible
It’s not harming anyone by taking their time - I don’t recall any specific timetable so I’m pretty sure it’s best for us all to make sure it’s done properly as opposed to quickly.
As long as whatever happens is in our best interest then I don’t care if they have to take their time doing it
I tend to remember it being you that became rabid suggesting we need a plan and that the Pm hadn't sent you a personal copy of one. My preferred plan was always the same; Leave the EU, single market, customs union, stop free movement and adopt a points based immigration system, no more influence from the ECJ, try and agree a free trade agreement but if the EU play hard then walk from it and adopt WTO rules which would be better for us.
That was my plan and a bold honest one.
Gove is a skilled politician, very capable and arguably gets more done than any minister in whichever dept he heads up but he is also hungry to ascend and will use any means to get there. Seems like Brexiteers are quickly looking beyond Gove and Boris now as their man after Friday's soft brexit agreement/climbdown from both, didn't have the cahones to make a stand and walk.
Jacob Rees Mogg has principles at least and I think that will stand him in good stead going forward with the Tory right. Expect him to be party leader within 5 years.