jp5
Q-School Graduate
At the start of the season the club has targets, one of them being CL qualification. Objective met = success, albeit partial success as the other targets are all missed. Not mega success but certainly some success.
So Arsenal should sack a manager that has been very successful in the first 9 years, but only moderately successful in the past 9 years?
If it were you, would you seriously sack a (somewhat) successful manager and replace him with someone else knowing full well that it could go very wrong. You agreed , Klopp could be a failure. Its bad enough having to swap a good manager when you need to (look at Man United) why would you do that by choice?
No no no no!
Champions League qualification should be a byproduct of an attempt at winning the league. There is nothing successful about qualifying for a competition that Arsenal have no chance of winning. The board may see it as success (for financial reasons), as you may do for some strange reason, but the majority of Arsenal fans don't.
I believe that whoever comes in after Wenger may struggle. Purely because Wenger has construed a team of small, technical yet indirect players, with many of them on over inflated wages. But for the long time health of the club the sooner a new manager comes in (and dispels this myth that finishing 4th is an achievement).