SwingsitlikeHogan
Major Champion
From my skewed perspective again, one good thing about hard copies is that some of them stay around as historical documents.
How much of today's on-line content will be available in 30 or 40 years time?
If some of it was around, would you trust that it still says exactly what it said when first written, or has some of it been cut/edited/airbrushed?
As we become more and more reliant on on-line pages I worry about the future availability of accurate historical documents, electronic stuff is too easily deleted once it's lost it's immediacy and too easy to "amend".
A very Orwellian thought as this is precisely the job on Winston Smith. Edit the historical record to shape it to confirm the validity of today's political agenda. Hmm. As if..
For me - the printed word will never not be something I value. I love my copy of Golf Monthly from the late 70s - with a picture of a swashbuckling Seve on the cover - and not a lot of ads.