rulefan
Tour Winner
I am just awaiting a situation update from EG.Unfortunately that’s not from EG or CONGU as asked, and referred to in #26.
I am just awaiting a situation update from EG.Unfortunately that’s not from EG or CONGU as asked, and referred to in #26.
"...as confirmed by CONGU..."Unfortunately that’s not from EG or CONGU as asked, and referred to in #26.
Unfortunately that’s not from EG or CONGU as asked, and referred to in #26.
Have we he ard from EG or CONGU officially on this yet? I haven’t seen anything but may have missed it.
If I check with my County Handicap Advisor, they have not had anything official from EG or CONGU yet, hence my question.If I contact EG on a matter of handicap, EG will refer me to the County Handicap Adviser. To me, that means the County Handicap Adviser speaks for EG.
"as confirmed by CONGU and the R&A (so both Rules of Handicapping and Rules of Golf)" would seem to give it an air of authority.
So a social score is not acceptable when played alongside an ‘amongst friends’ 4BB?We heard officially when the Rules of Handicapping was published. Acceptable scores in the CONGU jurisdictions can only be returned from singles stroke play [Rule 2.1a] Fourball is not, whether a formal competition or a knock about with your friends, a singles format.
If I check with my County Handicap Advisor, they have not had anything official from EG or CONGU yet, hence my question.
County Handicap Advisors all have a Regional Handicap Advisor as the next rung above them in the ladder.The person who emailed me with that information has a revised title of Regional Handicap Adviser which implies that she is now part of EG and not the County structure.
They are doing so in conjunction with "Most Likely Score"; I understand that the prevailing opinion is (or was) that the two go hand in hand.As I posted, CONGU has determined that general play scores are not returnable when played within a team event (ie with a partner). The head concho at EG has told me that CONGU, EG (and no doubt the other unions) will be publishing a notice. I am awaiting an update on that.
I guess there may be some difficulty with the GUI having decided to trial the idea in 4BBB.
County Advisers are nominated by the county. Regional Advisers are chosen from them as the focal point for the County Advisers.The person who emailed me with that information has a revised title of Regional Handicap Adviser which implies that she is now part of EG and not the County structure.
So a social score is not acceptable when played alongside an ‘amongst friends’ 4BB?
This seems to be not what has been accepted elsewhere and by many posting here. Have clubs made this clear to their members when advising re acceptance of ‘social scores’?
OK, moving on from the above.Following on from above, 4 players A,B,C and D decide to submit individual “general play” scores, then pair up as A&B and C&D, for a 4BBB matchplay game concurrently. They putt out on every hole. But if B gives A any advice the players should add 2 strokes to their “general play” score each time, although it’s allowable for the matchplay, correct?
The next day, all 4 meet again but this time only A and C are submitting “general play” scores, B and D are caddying respectively. On this occasion, the same advice B gives A is allowable and doesn’t result in the general penalty for A, whereas the day before the same advice incurred a 2 stroke penalty. Correct ?
Logical?
If I am reading Colin L‘s post #44 correctly any of the players scores submitted whilst they are also playing a fourball matchplay or strokeplay (BB or 2 out of 4 etc.) are not acceptable for handicap purposes.OK, moving on from the above.
All four play again, this time A&B play matchplay against C&D, but only A and C have registered their intent to submit a “general play” card for handicap purposes. Can B and D give advice to their partners in this scenario?
Slightly off topic, but related, what about when it’s “teams of 4, best 2 to count” and one or two of the four register on the EG App to include their round as “general play”?
In effect it is any situation where 'partners' or 'team' members may be in a position to give advice whether they do or not.OK, moving on from the above.
All four play again, this time A&B play matchplay against C&D, but only A and C have registered their intent to submit a “general play” card for handicap purposes. Can B and D give advice to their partners in this scenario?
Slightly off topic, but related, what about when it’s “teams of 4, best 2 to count” and one or two of the four register on the EG App to include their round as “general play”?
If intending to submit scores for handicapping, players must only play, and follow the rules of, individual strokeplay.OK, moving on from the above.
All four play again, this time A&B play matchplay against C&D, but only A and C have registered their intent to submit a “general play” card for handicap purposes. Can B and D give advice to their partners in this scenario?
Slightly off topic, but related, what about when it’s “teams of 4, best 2 to count” and one or two of the four register on the EG App to include their round as “general play”?
You mean during a competitive am-am? If I was the teams behind I'd be hoofing them up the arse for that. Absolute joke, total disrespect to the rest of the field.OK, moving on from the above.
All four play again, this time A&B play matchplay against C&D, but only A and C have registered their intent to submit a “general play” card for handicap purposes. Can B and D give advice to their partners in this scenario?
Slightly off topic, but related, what about when it’s “teams of 4, best 2 to count” and one or two of the four register on the EG App to include their round as “general play”?