2019 Cricket

patricks148

Global Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
24,550
Location
Highlands
Visit site
one thing confused me why is pick Archer if his Quckest ball was mid 80's ( from what i saw) i get picking him if he is getting it down at over 90 but Broad is faster than that and more consistant, didn't see woods speeds but
same for him?
 

fundy

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
27,053
Location
Herts/Beds border
Visit site
one thing confused me why is pick Archer if his Quckest ball was mid 80's ( from what i saw) i get picking him if he is getting it down at over 90 but Broad is faster than that and more consistant, didn't see woods speeds but
same for him?


nah Wood was over 90mph at times, decent enough wheels but a complete and utter waste on a pitch like this unless it really goes up and down tomorrow. Theyre picking the side they want for the Ashes not for a test v WI at the Rose Bowl. Big argument to have picked neither of them here and saved them for Old Trafford where hopefully there will be more pace and bounce and played 2 from Broad, Woakes and Curran

if theyd picked the right side theyd have bowled first too lol
 

patricks148

Global Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
24,550
Location
Highlands
Visit site
have i missed something but Archer sending it down at low 80, what happened to the guy who was the only bowler that troubled smith in the ashes and bowling at mid 90's?
 

fundy

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
27,053
Location
Herts/Beds border
Visit site
have i missed something but Archer sending it down at low 80, what happened to the guy who was the only bowler that troubled smith in the ashes and bowling at mid 90's?


He was high 80s early on, but quickly saw little point in bowling flat out, bigger issue was he bowled too short most of the time

remain to be convinced hes a new ball bowler either, think hes better with an older ball
 

HomerJSimpson

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
70,584
Location
Bracknell - Berkshire
Visit site
as longs as its not Dear Jonny they replace him with:LOL:
So who would you like to see as a keeper/batsman as picking a specialist keeper seems a long forgotten notion, especially from those that haven't played for England. Surely hard and unfair to bring anyone into the fold at this stage with no-one having played any cricket for so long so until we get regular longer format cricket back are we not stuck with the options we have
 

fundy

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
27,053
Location
Herts/Beds border
Visit site
So who would you like to see as a keeper/batsman as picking a specialist keeper seems a long forgotten notion, especially from those that haven't played for England. Surely hard and unfair to bring anyone into the fold at this stage with no-one having played any cricket for so long so until we get regular longer format cricket back are we not stuck with the options we have


could always pick a specialist keeper who averages over 40 in test match cricket who played in the warm up game, or maybe the other keeper who played in the warm up game and got 80 odd, tbh anyone but JB or JB lol
 

Captainron

Big Hitting, South African Sweary Person
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
6,363
Location
Rural Lincolnshire
Visit site
How the my keep persisting with Buttler in the test team is beyond me. I think that Stokes must have lobbied hard for his mate to be included here.

Foakes is your best keeper. He must play in the second test.
 
Top