D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
My take on the Hales situation:
1.) England winning the World Cup means they can comment from a position of strength. Had they not won the WC then more questions may be asked about Hales' absence.
2.) Morgan's sanctimony over the whole saga is rather nauseous. Players such as Shane Warne and Ian Botham have returned to their respective teams in the past after drugs issues after all.
3.) Whatever the actual truth about the Stokes saga, the rapid return of him to the team afterward does make the reaction to Hales rather hypocritical.
4.) England may be the world champs at 50 over cricket but they are mediocre at T20 cricket which is where Hales will be missed most. In that respect they are the reverse of the West Indies.
https://www.icc-cricket.com/rankings/mens/team-rankings/t20i
Im confuses at the last point ?
We are second the rankings for T20 and haven’t lost a T20 series for a couple years beating - Sri Lanka , SA , Windies , India and a drawn series with NZ plus one off win against Aus
Sorry but I don’t see how England can be mediocre when the results don’t show that