BubbaP
Occasional Player of Golf
The table in that link is consistent with the Rules manual but just laid out differently.
https://www.congu.co.uk/whs/
That one looks like the one on the WHS slides that were used at the workshops.
The other one is the one from the posters in the toolkit for the clubs to use
yes as per Rulesfan
https://www.congu.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CONGU-Rules-of-Handicapping1.pdf
https://www.congu.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/WHSDocs/Handicapping-Advice.pdf
Thanks for your links.
Think this is the strangest set of posts I've been involved in on here, but I like a challenge It's no big deal but I'll have another go.
To recap, I was pointing out that SG have put out on the internet this month, tweeted and on other social media the link that I shared (or the image from it)
https://scottishgolf.org/course-handicap-playing-handicap-calculations/#
I was highlighting that I didn't care for the format they had chosen
I was interested in comments on this - agree, disagree, don't care, don't understand, etc.
Not - here are some other links, as that isn't really the point.
Rulefan I think you did ultimately agree that the format/lay out was different.
So from Appendix C of the links you shared we see - which to me looks like the version EG shared. I'd probably give this 8.5 / 10
So my point was, why have SG put out something different in layout/format? I'd give that maybe 5 / 10.
My starting point here is:
Purpose: Rule 21 covers four other forms of individual play, including three forms of stroke play where scoring is different than in regular stroke play: Stableford (scoring by points awarded on each hole); Maximum Score (the score for each hole is capped at a maximum); and Par/Bogey (match play scoring used on a hole by hole basis).
An analogy might be Stroke Play are fruit, and Match Play are vegetables. Stableford are apples, Par/Bogey are oranges
I've read/heard many a time, things like "I don't play stableford, I only play stroke play" ("I don't eat applies, I only eat fruit" - eh?)
If you've made it this far, and wonder why I didn't give Appendix C 10 / 10 - well I think just having the first line of "type of round" as "Individual" is a bit rubbish, when the next three are also "Individual". Couldn't they have come up with anything better?
I notice in the links you provided there are references to "Stroke Play Competitions: Medal; "
Anyway, all done, as I said is no biggie. Roll on the 2nd.