rulefan
Tour Winner
I thought that the wrong 'handicap' being used was causing the issue.There still appear to be serious doubts about this, as it doesn't look that way in the Portal the rest of us have looked at
I thought that the wrong 'handicap' being used was causing the issue.There still appear to be serious doubts about this, as it doesn't look that way in the Portal the rest of us have looked at
I don't think it will. The player's record structure is quite different.
See Appendix B in the book
1) The system is attempting to equalise winning opportunities for low and high cappers in stroke play.I get that so why penalise the high handicappers in strokeplay? What I don’t understand is why they’re different.
WHS presumably. Unless the file format of the CDH is changed and they then have two repositories of the data. 1) The WHS where all the number crunching is done and stored and 2) A slave revamped dumb CDH.Are you saying the CDH database is now redundan, where would we get player’s information for opens
I believe that if I do not let my club share by email address and DOB with EG then I will not be able to maintain a handicap index at the Club. Not that I have any issue sharing that information - is that the case?
Yes, they asked clubs to update all that information a week or so ago on their ISVs, otherwise players would not get an Index. That caused much frustration and panic, given a lot of clubs had a lot of missing information they suddenly needed to provide.I believe that if I do not let my club share by email address and DOB with EG then I will not be able to maintain a handicap index at the Club. Not that I have any issue sharing that information - is that the case?
I don't see how they justify requiring DOB. I cannot see which of the following can require a DOB (list of things that they use the personal information for, taken from EG WHC Privacy Notice):Yes, they asked clubs to update all that information a week or so ago on their ISVs, otherwise players would not get an Index. That caused much frustration and panic, given a lot of clubs had a lot of missing information they suddenly needed to provide.
I was told it's to differentiate between EG,David Brown and another David Brown at any one clubI don't see how they justify requiring DOB. I cannot see which of the following can require a DOB (list of things that they use the personal information for, taken from EG WHC Privacy Notice):
• to provide you with your membership services;
• to calculate your handicap;
• to run golf competitions;
• to provide you with information that you request from us or which may be of interest to you;
• to notify you about changes to our services;
• to provide member support;
• for research about our members’ behaviour and our services generally, and to report to bodies such as Sport England; and
• to develop and improve our services, website and platforms.
Yes, they asked clubs to update all that information a week or so ago on their ISVs, otherwise players would not get an Index. That caused much frustration and panic, given a lot of clubs had a lot of missing information they suddenly needed to provide.
I don't see how they justify requiring DOB. I cannot see which of the following can require a DOB
I don't know. Does it help them determine what Section you are in (such as Seniors / Juniors), which feeds into what you may be interested in and conduct research on members behaviour?I don't see how they justify requiring DOB. I cannot see which of the following can require a DOB (list of things that they use the personal information for, taken from EG WHC Privacy Notice):
• to provide you with your membership services;
• to calculate your handicap;
• to run golf competitions;
• to provide you with information that you request from us or which may be of interest to you;
• to notify you about changes to our services;
• to provide member support;
• for research about our members’ behaviour and our services generally, and to report to bodies such as Sport England; and
• to develop and improve our services, website and platforms.
That's what an email does, surely? I am quite sure that there are several others with the same first name, last name and DOB as myself.I was told it's to differentiate between EG,David Brown and another David Brown at any one club
That should be true, although I suppose the e-mail address should do that, as I don't believe they allow shared e-mail addresses for multiple golfers?I was told it's to differentiate between EG,David Brown and another David Brown at any one club
Yes , you'd think so. For the multiple DOB and same names the email will do that so why the DOB , I don't know , just passing on what i was told .That's what an email does, surely? I am quite sure that there are several others with the same first name, last name and DOB as myself.
Two factor authentication if you wish to go onto the system yourself? Email is your Username and DOB is your Password?Yes , you'd think so. For the multiple DOB and same names the email will do that so why the DOB , I don't know , just passing on what i was told .
I get that so why penalise the high handicappers in strokeplay? What I don’t understand is why they’re different.
What would be the situation without 95%. That surely is the criterionAs I understand it it is about maintaining a similar difference between the two players
Take 3 players one with a HI of 10 another with a HI of 20 playing and a third with 30 and average course with a slope rating of 125
So there is 10 shots difference in their ability using HIs
Roughly with a 95% allowance
The 10 stays at 10
The 20 goes to 21
The 30 goes to 31
so it is actually the lowest handicap player that is the worst off. Without the 95% he would now be 2 shots worse off compared to the 30 handicapper.
11 22 33What would be the situation without 95%. That surely is the criterion