I fancy an upset and someone outside of the main head-liners to plot their way around who has been having a decent year to date, someone like Danny Willett, you heard it here first :smirk:
press conference with Tiger today. He was asked "after long lay off whats an acceptable finish" Answer "1st, i play to win"
:clap:
I'd love to see Tiger win this week. It would be the biggest comeback of all time!
I'd love to see Tiger win this week. It would be the biggest comeback of all time!
Not going to happen imo. I fancy a European and would love to see someone like Donald do it. I have a gut feeling Jimenez might have a decent week
no chance for either of them![]()
Better chance than your big prediction Mr WUM
Guy who has won 14 majors against two guys with none, not even within sniffing distance- Nae chance!
WUM?
Let me ask you tiger backers this, who is more likely to win, tiger or rose?
I've backed Tiger on the 'Fair. Not because I think he will win, however, but because I am hopeful that he will have a decent first round causing the odds to lower so I can trade off and win either way.
I wouldn't go out there and say there's no chance of him winning, but I don't think an outright bet without an exit strategy is the right call.
I've backed Tiger on the 'Fair. Not because I think he will win, however, but because I am hopeful that he will have a decent first round causing the odds to lower so I can trade off and win either way.
I wouldn't go out there and say there's no chance of him winning, but I don't think an outright bet without an exit strategy is the right call.
I think this is clever but I don't understand it (or betting) can you elaborate for us weekend gamblers?
nope not getting it- that means betting more money on him at lower odds doesn't it? I must be missing something (apart from a screw)On Betfair you can back and lay bets. He has backed Tiger Woods at say 26 or 27 to 1 whatever he is on there at the moment.
If Tiger has a good first round his odds will be less and then he can lay a bet on him at lower odds.
The only downside is if Tiger doesn't do that well or starts limping in the first round his odds will go up and therefore you would probably have to let it ride or trade out for a loss.
Let me ask you tiger backers this, who is more likely to win, tiger or rose?
nope not getting it- that means betting more money on him at lower odds doesn't it? I must be missing something (apart from a screw)