golfgod1ab
Medal Winner
Great look forward to it on box office in a few years!
Did you watch it?
Sky did a great job covering it - that wasn't ever the problem
There will be some parts that some people like and there will be some parts that people didn't like -
Some will prefer what BBC did and some will prefer the Sky coverage - there is no right and wrong answer in regards what people's opinions on how each broadcast the sport
The biggest issue for was always the loss of viewers as with all sports that have moved across to Sky - it was another of the great sporting occasions gone to subscription telly and that for me was a bad thing
Today was great to watch - not because of Sky or because it wasn't on the BBC or who was commentating but because of the golf itself from the players - being on Sky didn't make that difference - it would have been no different if it was on any channel but the biggest shame is instead of 4 to 5 million watching it you will get under a million - if people think that's nothing to worry about then fine , for me I think it is.
So Mark Roe has just talked this up as eclipsing the Duel In The Sun at Turnberry in 1977. You couldn't make it up.
"Very predictable from a sky pundit" how on earth is that comment talking Sky up, they broadcasted it, they never hit the shots. Lowest ever total to win an Open and and a runner up with a score that would've won 140 out of the last 144 Opens. We witnessed history today and it had nothing to do with Sky.Very predictable from a Sky pundit , I think everyone on Sky at some point talked up Sky this week. It's just one big advertising , money making machine - the TV equivalent of TalkSport.
It would have been even better on the Beeb today and no subscription needed to boot.
It may well do mate, I've watched the Duel in the Sun a few times this week and loved it, today I watched this one as it happened and found it just as exciting.So Mark Roe has just talked this up as eclipsing the Duel In The Sun at Turnberry in 1977. You couldn't make it up.
Sky did a great job covering it - that wasn't ever the problem
There will be some parts that some people like and there will be some parts that people didn't like -
Some will prefer what BBC did and some will prefer the Sky coverage - there is no right and wrong answer in regards what people's opinions on how each broadcast the sport
The biggest issue for was always the loss of viewers as with all sports that have moved across to Sky - it was another of the great sporting occasions gone to subscription telly and that for me was a bad thing
Today was great to watch - not because of Sky or because it wasn't on the BBC or who was commentating but because of the golf itself from the players - being on Sky didn't make that difference - it would have been no different if it was on any channel but the biggest shame is instead of 4 to 5 million watching it you will get under a million - if people think that's nothing to worry about then fine , for me I think it is.
"Very predictable from a sky pundit" how on earth is that comment talking Sky up, they broadcasted it, they never hit the shots.
"Very predictable from a sky pundit" how on earth is that comment talking Sky up, they broadcasted it, they never hit the shots. Lowest ever total to win an Open and and a runner up with a score that would've won 140 out of the last 144 Opens. We witnessed history today and it had nothing to do with Sky.
Its because it was shown on Sky that he said that, that's how. Shameless bigging up of Sky all the time even Harmon got on in the act today.
Somehow I don't think Rowe would have said that if the Live coverage was on Beeb and Sky was just reporting on it.
Its because it was shown on Sky that he said that, that's how. Shameless bigging up of Sky all the time even Harmon got on in the act today.
Somehow I don't think Rowe would have said that if the Live coverage was on Beeb and Sky was just reporting on it.
I agree with the point about Sky's coverage, but we witnessed history today, you can't go any further over the top than that.Sky turn nothing stories into a massive talking point, it's how they exist. You can see it on most of their channels, the majority of presenters sensationalise small things to give the impression something spectacular has happened. In other words copying US TV.
Their coverage this year has been top notch but sometimes they do go way over the top.
"Very predictable from a sky pundit" how on earth is that comment talking Sky up, they broadcasted it, they never hit the shots. Lowest ever total to win an Open and and a runner up with a score that would've won 140 out of the last 144 Opens. We witnessed history today and it had nothing to do with Sky.
Sky turn nothing stories into a massive talking point, it's how they exist. You can see it on most of their channels, the majority of presenters sensationalise small things to give the impression something spectacular has happened. In other words copying US TV.
Their coverage this year has been top notch but sometimes they do go way over the top.
Its because it was shown on Sky that he said that, that's how. Shameless bigging up of Sky all the time even Harmon got on in the act today.
Somehow I don't think Rowe would have said that if the Live coverage was on Beeb and Sky was just reporting on it.
Hmmmm I don't think sky are the only ones guilty of this- at Euro 2016 many times we were fed by both BBQ and itv "oh what a great game this is" when in all honesty it was garbage they just didn't want you turning over the the gardening channel!