The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
Am I right in thinking that until ball is touched at a corner the ball is dead and so nothing can happen. Refs have not got the bottle to penalise the defender, it always seems the attacker is committing the foul. Maybe it will just take a farcical couple of weeks in all divisions and have 6,7,8,9 penalties a game and it might stop. Like anything in this life, if the wrong doers have no consequences, then why stop
It’s a good job the referees and the leagues agreed to clamp down on holding at corners and set pieces, really been successful 🥳
 
Do you think that’s a penalty?
He lets go before he gets in the box and Cunha decided to go down imo.
That’s a dive you would never get him down with that unless he chose to.

No. I thought it was soft when I saw it first hand, and then when I saw it on television.

But the actions of the Palace player allowed everything which followed.
 
Do you think that’s a penalty?
He lets go before he gets in the box and Cunha decided to go down imo.
That’s a dive you would never get him down with that unless he chose to.

Penalty and red card were the correct call.
I'd also have given Cunha a yellow for diving.
However, by going to ground he brought the ref's attention to the fact that he'd been pulled back.
The danger is that, if he'd stayed on his feet, play would merely have continued.
Players often go to groung to highlight the fact that a foul is being/has been committed.
 
Penalty and red card were the correct call.
I'd also have given Cunha a yellow for diving.
However, by going to ground he brought the ref's attention to the fact that he'd been pulled back.
The danger is that, if he'd stayed on his feet, play would merely have continued.
Players often go to groung to highlight the fact that a foul is being/has been committed.

That’s an interesting view - so players can now dive to over exaggerate any touch

At most it’s a yellow outside the box but it’s definitely a dive as soon as he got in the box

But it’s just another example of inconsistency within the refs
 
I thought it was a penalty as the holding started outside the area but continued inside, which by the rules now means it’s a penalty.
I thought sending him off a bit harsh but can understand why the ref thought it was denying a goal scoring opportunity.
 
That’s an interesting view - so players can now dive to over exaggerate any touch

At most it’s a yellow outside the box but it’s definitely a dive as soon as he got in the box

But it’s just another example of inconsistency within the refs
Is there any surprise that referees are getting it wrong when players, from all teams, at all levels, are continually trying to con the referee. Also, the repeated slow mo replays and constant criticism form armchair referees and ex players who don't always know the rules is bound to undermine their confidence.
 
Penalty and red card were the correct call.
I'd also have given Cunha a yellow for diving.
However, by going to ground he brought the ref's attention to the fact that he'd been pulled back.
The danger is that, if he'd stayed on his feet, play would merely have continued.
Players often go to groung to highlight the fact that a foul is being/has been committed.
A pen and red card even though you think it’s a dive 😳
 
Yes and you all criticised him for it .
But as soon as it’s a UTD player ???
We criticise Salah for it because he is a regular offender, and many times he goes down for even lesser contact.

Man Utd fans also criticised Ashley Young for it, so not fair to generalise us in being inconsistent on a one off incident such as this. An incident that many actually agree it was a foul, but debate whether it should be a penalty or free kick.
 
Top