I'm not sure how it does in this case. They are not spreading a transfer fee across 6 years, just his wages.Helps with costs and ffp etc etc but madness
I'm not sure how it does in this case. They are not spreading a transfer fee across 6 years, just his wages.Helps with costs and ffp etc etc but madness
Yeah, it's just a nonsense way of saying fans want to see attacking football. I wonder if Stoke fans talk about 'the Stoke way', which would be a 4-4-2 of industrious players and long throws.
Honestly, some Spurs fans still credit Ange for playing 'the Spurs way' even though it lost us two thirds of our games. Fans are dumb.
That helps with it and they still need to pay compensation to the other club who they own anyway but has to go through the booksI'm not sure how it does in this case. They are not spreading a transfer fee across 6 years, just his wages.
No, they normally refer to 1961 when we were the best team around. Little bit before my time. The best team I'll probably ever see was around 2017.Bit isn't losing two thirds of your games 'The Spurs Way'?![]()
Wonder if there are any clauses in his contract,targets that he’s expected to meet.He must be rubbing his hands with sooo much glee!!!
His salary will be accounted for annually, so spreading it over 6 years makes no difference. Any compensation is surely nominal, unless it's another way of moving money around within the ownership.That helps with it and they still need to pay compensation to the other club who they own anyway but has to go through the books
His salary will be accounted for annually, so spreading it over 6 years makes no difference. Any compensation is surely nominal, unless it's another way of moving money around within the ownership.
It still doesn't make sense, I don't see 6 yrs being an accounting method on this occasion.
Thoughts on this one appreciated Don B. Spent a week away with a Forest fan and she sent me this.Jeez, are you all still talking about Manyoo, rather than getting excited about the MASSIVE game that's on tonight???
I am of course talking about West Ham v Forest.
Or, if you wish to use the proper name: El Crappio.
We should be on the phone to Edu now, 'Beto and Barry are available, sure they will fit in. We will even cover the taxi for both of them across to Nottingham'.Thoughts on this one appreciated Don B. Spent a week away with a Forest fan and she sent me this.
I don’t disagree. Which managers have proven track records these days though ? We tried it with LVG and it didn’t work ….he’d won the champs league , la liga and bundesliga !
I’ve honestly no idea who I’d have.
The only real "busts" on here, for me, are Dan Ndoye and maybe McAtee but Jury is out on him a bit. I'm sure there's a good player in there, but we've yet to see enough of him! On Ndoye, he basically scores or assists (or both!) every time he plays for his country - so he's not a bad footballer, but don't think he's suited to the Premier League (not yet, anyway)Thoughts on this one appreciated Don B. Spent a week away with a Forest fan and she sent me this.
He's looked ineffective most of the time he's come on. Or just "ok"...I just dont' think he suits the style of football we play. Needs tippy, tappy pep ball I think.We should be on the phone to Edu now, 'Beto and Barry are available, sure they will fit in. We will even cover the taxi for both of them across to Nottingham'.
As a City fan, what do you think about McAtee not getting a game? He looked good last year, I would have liked him at Everton based on those performances. He's barely had a sniff this season.
He's not daft, he'll be the Chelsea manager in a yearGary O'Neil getting a crack at the Strasbourg job, good for him.
I think this is always going to be a problem, what do you need to do, or have done, to be a proven manager. If it's won the premier league in the last 10 years or so, then that's a very small listI agree there's a lack of proven managers out there at the moment. LVG was way past his best when you got him though.
I personally don't rate Glasner that highly. He's done well at Palace but plays a back 3 and hasn't done it at a big club, which is a whole different level.
I would honestly give it to Ole for the rest of the season as he's proven he can be a good short term manager, get the positive feelings back and plays a very solid 4231 which suits most of the team. I would then get Poch in because he's someone that has experience in England and did well at Spurs and at Chelsea given the circumstances. He's also had the pressure of managing a top team in PSG and won things. He's made some poor career moves but he ticks all the boxes for a long term Utd manager in my eyes.
Ole’s (back) at the wheel apparently.
Nice chap but a limited manager. I guess we’re looking for a short term bounce, get the feel good back and then try for a permanent solution in the summer.
Can’t help but feel this is a never ending cycle now and will only end when the present ownership (politely) go away.