The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
Bounced around? A loan to one club, then loaned to another who signed him

That's hardly bouncing

3 solid seasons at one club out of 4 years in Germany.


He is 26 in December and played 3 seasons for a mid to lower table team in Bundasliga with the team fighting relegation for the last two seasons

Was he that highly rated ?

If so then I would have expected some bigger clubs looking and a bigger fee for someone who should be in their prime now
 
He is 26 in December and played 3 seasons for a mid to lower table team in Bundasliga with the team fighting relegation for the last two seasons

Was he that highly rated ?

If so then I would have expected some bigger clubs looking and a bigger fee for someone who should be in their prime now

Well done you found Wikipedia

So you admit he didn't "bounce around" in Germany

He went to one 2nd Division club, then was loaned to the 1st Division for 2 seasons to a club who then bought him.

They may have been lower table but doesn't A make him rubbish or B means he has "bounced about"

Maybe research your point next time before you try and make it
 
Well done you found Wikipedia

So you admit he didn't "bounce around" in Germany

He went to one 2nd Division club, then was loaned to the 1st Division for 2 seasons to a club who then bought him.

They may have been lower table but doesn't A make him rubbish or B means he has "bounced about"

Maybe research your point next time before you try and make it
So he was bought by Arsenal played a couple of games , loaned to one club , then loaned to another club and then bought - West Ham is his 4th club since 2019

And all through the age where you would expect most players to be settled into their team not acting like a Academy player going on loan to a number of clubs and then the club making a little profit on him

Either way - it’s looks like cheap signing that if it works out great , if not within 24 months will prob go back to the same level of club with a little bit of a loss. The sort of signings that most mid table clubs do
 
So he was bought by Arsenal played a couple of games , loaned to one club , then loaned to another club and then bought - West Ham is his 4th club since 2019

And all through the age where you would expect most players to be settled into their team not acting like a Academy player going on loan to a number of clubs and then the club making a little profit on him

Either way - it’s looks like cheap signing that if it works out great , if not within 24 months will prob go back to the same level of club with a little bit of a loss. The sort of signings that most mid table clubs do

Quite a similar career to one salah pre Liverpool no?

2 clubs in Europe before chelsea snap him up

Bearly plays

Goes out on loan "bounces around in Italy" for 3 seasons

Before he comes back to the premier league at a similar age ......
 
Wasn't that ultimately down to him? He wanted more of a payoff from Utd and when he didn't get it he dug his heels in. That was the report. He could be playing regularly if he wanted it.
Depends on who/what you want to believe.

Let's be honest, irrespective of his wealth, he is entitled to be paid the remaining of his contract if the new proposed wages were less as he never requested a transfer.

He cant be blamed for wanting what he is owed contractually.

EtH didnt fancy him from the outset and brought in Martinez to replace him. Yernited dont want him so pay him what he's owed and move on.

I think he believes in his own ability and would rather stay and fight for his place with them being in the CL than play for West Ham.
 
Couple of other avenues ....utd didnt and shouldn't have had to roll over.

West Ham could have paid him £5m more if they really wanted him ??

Or HM could have sacrificed 6 months salary in return for regular football.
Correct they shouldn't but they have got to honour his contract they gave him.

No working man/woman/they/them* should sacrifice any amount of salary.
 
Depends on who/what you want to believe.

Let's be honest, irrespective of his wealth, he is entitled to be paid the remaining of his contract if the new proposed wages were less as he never requested a transfer.

He cant be blamed for wanting what he is owed contractually.

EtH didnt fancy him from the outset and brought in Martinez to replace him. Yernited dont want him so pay him what he's owed and move on.

I think he believes in his own ability and would rather stay and fight for his place with them being in the CL than play for West Ham.

Short sighted by Utd too. If Maguire is on £150k a week, it’s £7.8m a year. Give him the £5m he is reported to have asked for and save £2.8m. There must be more to the story than a simple business mistake like that…
 
Quite a similar career to one salah pre Liverpool no?

2 clubs in Europe before chelsea snap him up

Bearly plays

Goes out on loan "bounces around in Italy" for 3 seasons

Before he comes back to the premier league at a similar age ......

It terms of how many clubs it similar

But I’m sure it was one club before Chelsea where he won 2 titles and helped the club into the group stage of the CL , and then in Italy with teams at the top end of the table and being top scorer for them one season and the reason we he went for a club record fee at the time.
 
Short sighted by Utd too. If Maguire is on £150k a week, it’s £7.8m a year. Give him the £5m he is reported to have asked for and save £2.8m. There must be more to the story than a simple business mistake like that…

The reports suggest he has 2 years left at around £8.5 mil a year , there is an apparent extra year option but I’m guessing the club won’t take that up - now there is the FFP issue with his fee still having the some part on the figures.
 
The reports suggest he has 2 years left at around £8.5 mil a year , there is an apparent extra year option but I’m guessing the club won’t take that up - now there is the FFP issue with his fee still having the some part on the figures.

Good point. Sell at a loss would affect FFP, although I doubt Utd’s world-wide merchandising will comfortably cover that.
 
Southgate clearly said “players in form will be picked”
by any stretch Phillips and Maguire don’t fit that.


GS is the manager ,TH obviously dosnt rate him but GS does!

How does picking him protect him!
It exposes him imo.
Totally agree, I've mentioned this before on here. Southgate dropped a bollock with that comment.

Football is a game of opinions, if GS rates him then he can and will pick him, just because EtH doesnt rate him shouldn't stop GS from picking him.

By picking him for England, it sends a message of " i still rate you even if EtH doesnt". This keeps Maguire's confidence up and shows he's rated by Southgate. If he doesnt pick him then it sends a negative message of you're not good enough for Yernited or England and his career is potentially over.
 
Good point. Sell at a loss would affect FFP, although I doubt Utd’s world-wide merchandising will comfortably cover that.

They still have FFP issues though - their net spend since Ten Haag arrived is around £300mil , I think it’s what was stopping them from buying Amrabat out right , selling Maguire would have allowed them to get him straight away without the initial loan deal etc - also why they were trying to offload McTominay as well
 
The reports suggest he has 2 years left at around £8.5 mil a year , there is an apparent extra year option but I’m guessing the club won’t take that up - now there is the FFP issue with his fee still having the some part on the figures.

Actually, for arguments sake let’s say he signed for West Ham on a wage of £5m a year. He’s then £5m short of wages for the two years he left early from his Utd contract. A £5m payoff, maybe £2.5m from Utd and £2.5m, and he loses nothing. I can’t get my head round why a deal of some sort wasn’t put together. I get the feeling he just didn’t want to leave Utd, where he was comfortable in his pipe and slippers.
 
Actually, for arguments sake let’s say he signed for West Ham on a wage of £5m a year. He’s then £5m short of wages for the two years he left early from his Utd contract. A £5m payoff, maybe £2.5m from Utd and £2.5m, and he loses nothing. I can’t get my head round why a deal of some sort wasn’t put together. I get the feeling he just didn’t want to leave Utd, where he was comfortable in his pipe and slippers.

He wanted to stay and fight but was told he wasn't wanted

Moyes convinced him that we would build around him, make him captain (it's why no captain was announced)

He agreed to come on lower wages if united would cover the shortfall

If they had cut the price by 5 mil for this to smooth over I'm sure Scott mctominay would also be our player now aswell as we were considering him right until the last min.

More money in the coffers
 
Actually, for arguments sake let’s say he signed for West Ham on a wage of £5m a year. He’s then £5m short of wages for the two years he left early from his Utd contract. A £5m payoff, maybe £2.5m from Utd and £2.5m, and he loses nothing. I can’t get my head round why a deal of some sort wasn’t put together. I get the feeling he just didn’t want to leave Utd, where he was comfortable in his pipe and slippers.

There is very much the idea that he thought he could stay and fight for his place , he didn’t really want to move to a club that in previous years was at the other end of the table and was happy to pick up the big wage whilst trying to force his way back in.

The one thing I can’t see anywhere is what wage West Ham were offering him , maybe the drop was significant hence why he was looking for a payoff

But he seems a very good fit for West Ham or Everton etc
 
There is very much the idea that he thought he could stay and fight for his place , he didn’t really want to move to a club that in previous years was at the other end of the table and was happy to pick up the big wage whilst trying to force his way back in.

The one thing I can’t see anywhere is what wage West Ham were offering him , maybe the drop was significant hence why he was looking for a payoff

But he seems a very good fit for West Ham or Everton etc

£120k a week
 
There is very much the idea that he thought he could stay and fight for his place , he didn’t really want to move to a club that in previous years was at the other end of the table and was happy to pick up the big wage whilst trying to force his way back in.

The one thing I can’t see anywhere is what wage West Ham were offering him , maybe the drop was significant hence why he was looking for a payoff

But he seems a very good fit for West Ham or Everton etc

Definitely needed at Everton. They had the worst CB pairing for the last two seasons.
 
Short sighted by Utd too. If Maguire is on £150k a week, it’s £7.8m a year. Give him the £5m he is reported to have asked for and save £2.8m. There must be more to the story than a simple business mistake like that…
With FFP its not as easy as you've described Bri.

Chelsea will be in the same sticky position 24/36 months time with all of there players on long massive contracts.
 
Short sighted by Utd too. If Maguire is on £150k a week, it’s £7.8m a year. Give him the £5m he is reported to have asked for and save £2.8m. There must be more to the story than a simple business mistake like that…

Isn't the £5 million the difference between what he could have earned at United if he stayed for the rest of his contract and what he would have earned at West Ham if he'd left? That's how I always assumed it worked. If he's on £150k per week at Utd but was "only" offered £100k per week at West Ham he would be losing £2.6 million per season, and with two years left on his deal that would be the £5 million he wanted. Utd would have effectively been paying him £50k per week to play for West Ham to make up for lost wages, so they would've been saving £5 million per season?
 
Top