The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date

Pin-seeker

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
15,576
Visit site
No it's not, but throwing the league away to try and get a result against your biggest rivals shows a small club mentality.

I didnt expect "favours" obviously, but he could have played a team tonight and Thursday that was 75% strong by using his squad, rather than one that is 25% "strong" and one that will be his best available.

We should have done more ourselves throughout the season, even with the interminable injuries, but you expect a bit of integrity from the "world's biggest club" TM.
Here we go again ???????‍♂️
 

pokerjoke

Money List Winner
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
10,830
Location
Taunton ,Somerset
Visit site
Is it what's best for United though?

Just giving up the league like that, no matter how unlikely?

If it was Liverpool tonight, Leicester Thursday, tonight would have seen him play his strongest team of the week.

They used to act like a big club, but like 2 years ago, thats gone out of the window.

Remember when Ferguson had a go at Leeds for "cheating their fans", well the chickens have come home to roost.


Totally agree
Play the whole season then just drop it like a stone,bloody infuriating.
 

Liverbirdie

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,153
Location
liverpool
Visit site
Given the situation I think he did exactly the right thing.
Just one note to it the lack of fans allowed him to do it.
As I am sure 70,000 fans would not have liked that tonight.

Apart from Jota we havnt got a proper finisher and this season it has bitten us.
Mo scores but misses to many to put games to bed.

70k made no difference when they let city beat them at home 2 years ago. In the last few minutes, Man U just kept the ball, hardly attacked despite being 1 nil down. I wonder why?????? All gladly accepted the loss.

A bit different to when we beat Blackburn at Anfield, that they didn't take advantage of. Therein lies the difference.
 

Liverbirdie

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,153
Location
liverpool
Visit site
Could Liverpool have taken half their squad around the world and kept a few back for villa last year Pete?

Maybe he feels like the league deserved him to play a full strenght team against you as that's what he would have done for the original fixture.

So whilst it may have helped and hindered others. Maybe he's actually doing the right thing and planning he's strongest team as he would have done.

We had a three games out in Qatar, not just one, and a league title wasnt at stake.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
So Zaha ( once again ) goes down under the slightest touch in the box

The pundits - “clever from Zaha” “won the penalty” - no it was a dive because the touch wasn’t in anyway strong enough for him to go down.
 

pokerjoke

Money List Winner
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
10,830
Location
Taunton ,Somerset
Visit site
No it's not, but throwing the league away to try and get a result against your biggest rivals shows a small club mentality.

I didnt expect "favours" obviously, but he could have played a team tonight and Thursday that was 75% strong by using his squad, rather than one that is 25% "strong" and one that will be his best available.

We should have done more ourselves throughout the season, even with the interminable injuries, but you expect a bit of integrity from the "world's biggest club" TM.

I must be ill that’s twice I’ve agreed with you.
I couldn’t believe it when I saw the team sheet ,I actually thought we were in the C/L final at the weekend:)
 

Papas1982

Tour Winner
Banned
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
8,556
Location
Canterbury
Visit site
We had a three games out in Qatar, not just one, and a league title wasnt at stake.

Let's be honest Pete. You had more chance of winning the cup that utd did the league.

You wrote off a comp for something you seemed bigger.

Utd did the same. And also, maybe just maybe did so for the integrity of the league by making you play a string team like you would have last week
 

Liverbirdie

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,153
Location
liverpool
Visit site
Let's be honest Pete. You had more chance of winning the cup that utd did the league.

You wrote off a comp for something you seemed bigger.

Utd did the same. And also, maybe just maybe did so for the integrity of the league by making you play a string team like you would have last week

You dont throw leagues away to your city rivals, without shedding blood.

Your saying man u have shown integrity - sorry mate, even trying to see an opinion out of left field, I just dont know where you get that from?????
 

fundy

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
27,053
Location
Herts/Beds border
Visit site
Am a massive Foden fan, but hes started 15 prem games plus 11 as sub, been on the pitch for less than half the time City have played, scored 7 goals and had 5 assists

Cracking player and will be a world beater, but not player of the year for me, not enough of a contribution

Would be choosing between Dias, Fernandes and Kane, think Dias shades it
 

clubchamp98

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
17,812
Location
Liverpool
Visit site
So Zaha ( once again ) goes down under the slightest touch in the box

The pundits - “clever from Zaha” “won the penalty” - no it was a dive because the touch wasn’t in anyway strong enough for him to go down.
I don’t like this.
He delibaretly put his leg in front of Redmond .
They all do it Owen was good at it .
That’s why pundits will be no better than refs in the VAR box.
 

Papas1982

Tour Winner
Banned
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
8,556
Location
Canterbury
Visit site
You dont throw leagues away to your city rivals, without shedding blood.

Your saying man u have shown integrity - sorry mate, even trying to see an opinion out of left field, I just dont know where you get that from?????
Because they should have played a full strenght team against you last week.

So if they had gone full against leicester and then weak against you. You've benefitted where you shouldn't have.

And they didnt throw a league away. They may have given up on it. But that's two different things.
 

fundy

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
27,053
Location
Herts/Beds border
Visit site
Because they should have played a full strenght team against you last week.

So if they had gone full against leicester and then weak against you. You've benefitted where you shouldn't have.

And they didnt throw a league away. They may have given up on it. But that's two different things.


why did they have to play a weak side against one and full strength in the other, why not rest 5 for each game?
 

Liverbirdie

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,153
Location
liverpool
Visit site
why did they have to play a weak side against one and full strength in the other, why not rest 5 for each game?

Papas - as this.

They could have easily done the 60/30, play 60 minutes today, 30 minutes Thursday if required. Man U do have a big squad.

Again, I wouldnt expect any favours, and always expected him to keep more of his better players for our game, but he could have easily have picked a decent team for both.
 

GG26

Challenge Tour Pro
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
1,826
Visit site
The big difference for Leicester this season is that they have beaten all of the “big 6” in the league this season, whereas last year we struggled to get anything against them.
 

Tashyboy

Please don’t ask to see my tatts 👍
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Messages
19,737
Visit site
The big difference for Leicester this season is that they have beaten all of the “big 6” in the league this season, whereas last year we struggled to get anything against them.

If memory serves me right you’d didn’t beat City, you battered them.
 
Top