Swango1980
Well-known member
We probably won't need to predict the line up Southgate will choose for long. It seems like his starting line up is revealed a day or 2 before the game actually kicks off.
Not surprised Kane had a back problem after carrying the whole Bayern team all season. Gone over this before but I do find it weird when a striker gets flack in a team that is not creating anything. Is he supposed to score goals out of absolutely nothing all on his own? He's capable of it, but when he goes looking for the ball, people criticise that as well.Kane missed the last 2/3 games of the season with a back issue, that's not in form that's injured.
Saka wasnt setting the world alight this season, Palmers form was more impressive.
Foden was playing centrally, and so has no LW form to speak of.
Rice was playing an 8 now hes a 6.
Tripper is not a LB
Square pegs - round holes.
I hope he just picks his 10, be that Foden or Bellingham, and balances the midfield with Rice and one other - Mainoo looked better than Gallagher.
Then pick a LW to replace the gap on that side.
Start Kane fine, but he needs replacing earlier if he's doing absolutely nothing as he has for 3 games now bar a deflected tap in which is trademark Kane. Right place, right time.
I think Mainoo has proved he should be there imoI think we would all be happy with your selection, although I think Bellingham would be better alongside Rice
Saka was the highest-rated player in the Prem on WhoScored so he can't have been that bad: link Palmer's a good young talent, but I don't necessarily think that means rushing him into the line-up straight away, at the expense of another very good young player who's been one of England's best in the last two years.
That's fine but they're both good. Saka has been good for 2-3 years, Palmer has been good for about 8 months. Saka has arguably been one of our slightly better players too - certainly not someone I'd earmark as a problem that needs changing anyway. I don't think swapping him for Palmer would really change much. The problems are in the formation and system, changing one left-footed right-winger for another left-footed right-winger isn't going to have a huge effect.I don't buy all that protecting young talent stuff, if they're good enough then get them in regardless of age, unless they're like 10 or something
Saka has been good over the years but for me current form trumps historical form so I'd drop him.
Who is good right now, at this tournament? That is what really matters.That's fine but they're both good. Saka has been good for 2-3 years, Palmer has been good for about 8 months. Saka has arguably been one of our slightly better players too - certainly not someone I'd earmark as a problem that needs changing anyway. I don't think swapping him for Palmer would really change much. The problems are in the formation and system, changing one left-footed right-winger for another left-footed right-winger isn't going to have a huge effect.
Does he?? I thought he was one of the less bad ones to be honest. I'd be focussing on solving the Foden/Bellingham midfield conundrum rather than replacing a winger with a like-for-like winger, that's all.Who is good right now, at this tournament? That is what really matters.
Saka is excellent but he looks off right now. Use the squad, it is what it's there for.
If you play Foden on the right then you are just moving the Foden problem from the left side to the right. Play him in the middle or leave him on the bench.Does he?? I thought he was one of the less bad ones to be honest. I'd be focussing on solving the Foden/Bellingham midfield conundrum rather than replacing a winger with a like-for-like winger, that's all.
Arguably if you were dropping Saka you could just play Foden on the right and bring in Gordon on the left. Probably a better idea.
I think you need to consider that these are high energy positions and it’s 60mins then subbed off.That's fine but they're both good. Saka has been good for 2-3 years, Palmer has been good for about 8 months. Saka has arguably been one of our slightly better players too - certainly not someone I'd earmark as a problem that needs changing anyway. I don't think swapping him for Palmer would really change much. The problems are in the formation and system, changing one left-footed right-winger for another left-footed right-winger isn't going to have a huge effect.
Not an issue for SpainI don't buy all that protecting young talent stuff, if they're good enough then get them in regardless of age, unless they're like 10 or something
Saka has been good over the years but for me current form trumps historical form so I'd drop him.
A few posts back someone said Southgate must be arrogant. I think he is. I think he's thinking he'll do it his way and is reluctant to make the changes the whole nation is asking for - simply because the whole nation is asking for it. He's useless. Seriously beyond useless.
There seems to be an argument for not selecting pretty much every England "1st team" player, outside defence and goalkeeper. For example, some may see Kane as the biggest problem because he drops deep, but then do we really think England would play any better starting with Watkins or Toney?
Foden has been nowhere near as good as he has been for City, playing out on the left. Saka cuts in on his left foot a lot. Bellingham has been non existent except for his goal. Rice is passing side ways. Gallagher or TAA are not the answer in midfield. None of the attacking players have really been that impressive at all. Therefore, it is difficult to pinpoint the blame on one or 2 particular players, not playing the position properly, or being tired or injured. It seems like it is more fundamentally a Southgate problem. If he managed the Spanish or Portuguese team, I suspect they'd play awful boring football, whereas if England had their managers, they'd probably play much more positively.
I suspect for the next game, he'll play pretty much the same team, except play Mainoo instead of TAA or Gallagher, desperately looking for his new Kalvin Phillips. It is hard to not pick Palmer, so perhaps he plays him ahead of Saka, although I'm not sure Southgate is ready to drop Saka. And I'm pretty sure he'll keep Foden on the left. No way he is dropping his captain Kane, so tactically it is difficult to see how he can change a lot. He's probably quite rigid with his tactics, because maybe England looked good once before playing that way when thumping a team like San Marino, so he is convinced this is the best way to play football.
Yeah that was me - there's no way he could have missed all the countless suggestions to play Bellingham next to Rice and Foden at no.10. At this point his refusal to do it is arrogance. "I'm not having people tell me how to run the team." Cutting his nose off to spite his face.A few posts back someone said Southgate must be arrogant. I think he is. I think he's thinking he'll do it his way and is reluctant to make the changes the whole nation is asking for - simply because the whole nation is asking for it. He's useless. Seriously beyond useless.
Assuming it is simply that the players are at fault, and not the system. If the system is the problem, it is going to be pretty annoying changing a lot of England's best players to lesser players, and then finding out England are just as rubbish, if not worse. Experimenting in the group stages was bad enough, experimenting even more in the knockouts seems suicidal.Im not asking for them to start, im asking for them to feature if after 45 mins were offering nothing. Theyre all totally different players and all capable, I dont care how many Kane has scored for England in the past, I care about winning games now and we dont look like doing it atm so we have to try the other players.
Yep. I always think of Rice as a defender who roams forward a bit. Don't understand why he and GS think he's one of our playmakers who should be given the ball every time he calls his name, just so he can carry it forward until he's out of position then pass it backwards.Not surprised Kane had a back problem after carrying the whole Bayern team all season. Gone over this before but I do find it weird when a striker gets flack in a team that is not creating anything. Is he supposed to score goals out of absolutely nothing all on his own? He's capable of it, but when he goes looking for the ball, people criticise that as well.
Saka was the highest-rated player in the Prem on WhoScored so he can't have been that bad: link Palmer's a good young talent, but I don't necessarily think that means rushing him into the line-up straight away, at the expense of another very good young player who's been one of England's best in the last two years.
Foden has played on the left for City plenty of times, but it is a different system and I'd definitely like to see him play in the middle for England.
For me Rice's best position is DM. The whole trope of him playing number 8 is just his ego wanting to play that way. I don't know why Southgate is terrified of playing Bellingham next to him.
Correct on Trippier but we have zero other option because the only left back he called up is injured.
On a positive note, England haven't played well but are through on the easier side of the draw and can't play much worse.
Mainoo and Palmer would start for me in the next round, maybe Gordon as well.
Bellingham looks like he needs a rest, he's played some amount of games this last season and it looks like it's caught up with him the last 3 games (Maybe expectation on his shoulders as well?)
England still have a real chance to win this, only Spain look like the best team for me, France, Germany and Portugal are hot and cold.