clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Get Fiona Bruce in .Or Pat Nevin
Get Fiona Bruce in .Or Pat Nevin
I get what you're saying, but he's a sports presenter and, for want of a better word, a celeb who happens to have opinions that fall on the human rights side of centre.
What he is not is a law maker, law enforcer or instrument of the state. What about his freedom of speech and freedom of expression? He's not reading the news.
He won’t be missed.Shearer has pulled out too...
I suspect freedom of speech only protects us from being executed or put in prison. Not sure it protects us from consequences of other people's reactions.I get what you're saying, but he's a sports presenter and, for want of a better word, a celeb who happens to have opinions that fall on the human rights side of centre.
What he is not is a law maker, law enforcer or instrument of the state. What about his freedom of speech and freedom of expression? He's not reading the news.
It is relative.It depends what the market rate is. Don't forget, we only know his salary because the BBC have to publish it. We don't know what other presenters get paid on other channels.
Obviously it's a lot but it's all relative.
One of the things that I find difficult to explain is that for as long as I can remember the BBC have had many serving politicians of all stripes on shows for which they have been paid an appearance fee. When they're on TV they don't hold back their opinions.I don’t disagree, but I think the key here is that the BBC is a public service broadcaster. And we both know how public service works!
It’s noteworthy that BT Sport, the other broadcaster which Lineker works with, do not appear to have any issue, publicly at least, with what he has been up to on social media.
I actually like Pat Nevin when he's helping on radio commentary, says it as he sees it.Or Pat Nevin
Is there a mortgage application in the offing?One of the things that I find difficult to explain is that for as long as I can remember the BBC have had many serving politicians of all stripes on shows for which they have been paid an appearance fee. When they're on TV they don't hold back their opinions.
I struggle to see why Lineker attracts so much ire for doing something completely legal in his own time.
I actually like Pat Nevin when he's helping on radio commentary, says it as he sees it.
You'd go crackers if you went down that route. Footballers wages, prize money for golfers, film actors, TV presenters and so on. It's market forcesIt is relative.
I always ask myself is he worth 43 nurses .
Easily.You can understand him?
Anyway - back to football as opposed to politics
So when will Conte be sacked ?
Is it a Spurs issue - Mourinho wins trophies everywhere he goes - goes wrong at Spurs
Conte wins everywhere he goes - goes to Spurs - all falls apart
What’s going wrong there -spend loads , bring in quality players
In all honesty, I'd rather he presented MOTD than 43 nurses. That would just be chaotic.It is relative.
I always ask myself is he worth 43 nurses .
No Alex Scott
No Michah Richards
Looks like the might have to draft in Billy the Tea Boy.........
One of the things that I find difficult to explain is that for as long as I can remember the BBC have had many serving politicians of all stripes on shows for which they have been paid an appearance fee. When they're on TV they don't hold back their opinions.
I struggle to see why Lineker attracts so much ire for doing something completely legal in his own time.