Doubt it delc, he probably wrote it!
Dewsweeper
No, it written by the Institute of Advanced Motorists, and it does include the stats he asked for.
Doubt it delc, he probably wrote it!
Dewsweeper
Implying ?
Nope just think they are both high risks on the road and no don't have stats.
So why is it ok for you to base an opinion without stats, but if DelC professes an opinion, you leap straight on demanding them?
Because he is Liverpoolphil!So why is it ok for you to base an opinion without stats, but if DelC professes an opinion, you leap straight on demanding them?
Because he is Liverpoolphil!
I just asked if he had the stats that's all ? Didn't say it wasn't ok to do anything ?
I get that, but when other people offer an opinion, you seem to demand statistics or support for it. This is a common theme. When you have an opinion, you are happy for this to be unsupported, as it's "just an opinion". At the end of the day isn't doesn't bother me much, i just thought i would point it out to you, in the hope you may see the light![]()
BTW I would love to see the 30 years old's opinions to this thread in 40 years time.:lol:
I get that, but when other people offer an opinion, you seem to demand statistics or support for it. This is a common theme. When you have an opinion, you are happy for this to be unsupported, as it's "just an opinion". At the end of the day isn't doesn't bother me much, i just thought i would point it out to you, in the hope you may see the light![]()
How about if I think everyone is too dangerous to drive? I cannot wait for automated cars - the sooner people aren't trusted behind the wheel of a speeding metal box, the better for everyone.
At approaching 70 my fully comp insurance is less than £200.
A neighbours teenage son pays £1200 for 3rd party.
Has anyone any idea why there is such a difference in price?
BTW I would love to see the 30 years old's opinions to this thread in 40 years time.:lol:
At approaching 70 my fully comp insurance is less than £200.
A neighbours teenage son pays £1200 for 3rd party.
Has anyone any idea why there is such a difference in price?
BTW I would love to see the 30 years old's opinions to this thread in 40 years time.:lol:
No way there should be a re test every 10 years. Motoring costs enough without this and the impact it could have on people's jobs etc is not practical.
Out of all the car crashes i have attended the elderly are overwhelmingly the biggest offenders.
According to what the chap at Staffordshire safety road partnership said. Young people's premiums are higher because they are statistically more likely to cause damage to another vehicle than an old person. However guess what age-group have the highest rate of single vehicle accidents?
In 9 years of being in the fire service i have attended 2 fatalities from drivers below the age of 20. i have lost count of how many fatals I've had with 60 +
Only last week did we have a old chap that had a stroke behind the wheel, accelerator was then put to the floor and into a tree he went. The outcome was not good
Have you considered that it may be because there are many more drivers over 60 than there are under 20.