If you look at the angle from behind (23 seconds in), there is no tangle of legs, it's the most pathetic dive I've ever seen in my life!I would hope that he clipped his own legs to take a tumble like that rather than taking the time to pass it into the net.
It wasn't a dive, he just fell over.If you look at the angle from behind (23 seconds in), there is no tangle of legs, it's the most pathetic dive I've ever seen in my life!
had he been drinking?It wasn't a dive, he just fell over.
Yes, I do. There was nobody even near him.had he been drinking?
come on Ken, you can't believe that
did you not listen to the commentary on that clip?Yes, I do. There was nobody even near him.
There was no claim for a penalty and the BBC commentators did not say he dived.
Funniest thing about Silva is that Wolves paid £35million for him.
Looked like a push on the centre half. Was surprised there was no VAR check.Another goal for Dessers.
Another game without a penalty to Rangers too.
neither team is playing well. can see both of them dropping more points. that said, Celtic win their next two home games, the league is effectively over.If it wasn't for Butland, St. Mirren could easily have won yesterday.
Cantwell fouling the referee was pretty funny though.If it wasn't for Butland, St. Mirren could easily have won yesterday.
The ref deserved more than being fouled for booking Butland. How was Butland supposed to stop in mid air.Cantwell fouling the referee was pretty funny though.
Fortunate not to get booked.
If an outfield player had clattered someone like that, they would have been booked. Why should it be any different for a keeper?The ref deserved more than being fouled for booking Butland. How was Butland supposed to stop in mid air.
It was the out field player that ran into Butland, who had reached and cleared the ball while he was in the air.If an outfield player had clattered someone like that, they would have been booked. Why should it be any different for a keeper?
Unless Butland was standing still (which he obviously wasn't), then they were both running towards each other, and they collided after Butland played the ball. It was dangerous play from Butland, the booking was the right decision.It was the out field player that ran into Butland, who had reached and cleared the ball while he was in the air.
I would think the yellow card would be recinded on appeal.Unless Butland was standing still (which he obviously wasn't), then they were both running towards each other, and they collided after Butland played the ball. It was dangerous play from Butland, the booking was the right decision.
Unlikely given that yellow cards can only be appealed for simulation or mistaken identity.I would think the yellow card would be recinded on appeal.