stevie_r
Tour Winner
I'm just offended by people who try to justify racism of any kind by anyone as simple banter when it clearly offends others. Others being the key word. Just because something doesn't offend you doesn't make it ok and it also doesn't mean someone who it does offend is either
A. Overly sensitive.
or
B. Desperate to feel offended by something, anything
Clearly some of the Scottish people here are offended by some of the terms by posters that are used but it would seem nothing is done as it continues to happen.
This is not the only thread I have noticed it on either so I'm not basing my opinion on this one thread. I've been a member here since 2008 I just don't post as often as most but I do read a lot of the threads and disappointed that these attitudes are allowed to continue.
For what it worth I don't accept being called a Paddy or a Mick or a bead rattler or any other term that I think is derogatory to me but to some people its ok as its only banter...not in my eyes.
Anyway back to the big debate...
Aye or naw?
Well given the lack of responses, clearly Jock or Jockanese hasn't been found to be particularly offensive. Secondly, why did you feel the need to try and introduce religion into the debate.