McToot the Bandit
Member
Another noob question I know, but was just reading the thread on Inesis and Wilson balls and was struck by how little I know about what make golf balls good, bad, soft or long...
To be honest, I'm not yet good enough or experienced enough to be able to tell the difference between 'decent' balls beyond the obvious comparison between range balls and the Callaways or Titleist I play with. But I'm interested in the tech and theory. What are the key features behind why manufacturers charge what they do for balls?
BTW - as a parting aside - i thought it might amuse people to know that when I was a kid and first came into contact with golf, and golf balls specifically, I thought Titleist was pronounce Tit-leist, not Title-ist. Tickled me pink it did. How disappointed I was when I realised the error of my ways.
To be honest, I'm not yet good enough or experienced enough to be able to tell the difference between 'decent' balls beyond the obvious comparison between range balls and the Callaways or Titleist I play with. But I'm interested in the tech and theory. What are the key features behind why manufacturers charge what they do for balls?
BTW - as a parting aside - i thought it might amuse people to know that when I was a kid and first came into contact with golf, and golf balls specifically, I thought Titleist was pronounce Tit-leist, not Title-ist. Tickled me pink it did. How disappointed I was when I realised the error of my ways.