Swango1980
Well-known member
Didn't Europe also extensively look at the data when making decisions for their team?They absolutely gave him the job out of pity since he was overlooked two years for the team, and they obviously realised that had been a mistake. I'm not sure why he accepted it really, surely he could have said "I still have ambitions of playing in the team, so this is too soon for me to be captain"?
The mistakes he made are really just the same mistakes US captains of the past have made. A lot has been made of the Europeans using 'data' to pick their pairs - whatever 'data' means in this context - and USA don't. Sort of like that scene in moneyball, where Europe are Brad Pitt and Jonah Hill and USA are the old-school baseball scouts who don't trust it.
Has anyone even been a captain but then gone back to being a player in a future RC? I'm guessing no, but it could happen for him. That would be interesting.
Can the issue more generally be explained by more cultural issues? Do Americans, in social golf, generally grow up playing a lot of match play, particularly 4BBB? I didn't think they did. Is is ingrained into them what it feels like to play golf with a partner. 4BBB is a very common game for us. Anytime we are in a 4 ball, we seem to always play 4BBB rather than just solely keep our own scores. So, it just becomes second nature, where we know what it feels like to play with a partner, how to support our partner, how to use their support to helps us, etc?
I may be wrong, maybe Americans play it just as much as we do. However, I feel that they excel when they have control of everything. They are on their own, and the can revel in the success when they do well. They just seem much more uncomfortable when they are part of a double act. Is it just a coincicdence that two of the greatest golfers we have seen, Woods and Scheffler, seem to have a much poorer record when they are in a team compared to their own individual success.