Rugby Thread

  • Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date

ColchesterFC

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
7,234
Visit site
Despite the result it was good to watch a game that wasn't stop/start for video reviews. Just wish they could find a way to speed up the scrums as at the minute they seem to take all of the pace out of the match.
 

Lord Tyrion

Money List Winner
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
28,716
Location
Northumberland
Visit site
Yep, well done South Africa.
He's huge isn't he. He was walking back after the second try with his arms behind his head. I reckon his biceps are bigger than my thighs, and he's a winger 😳. Once he is running he is a monster to stop.

I watched it in a pub, couldn't hear the commentary. I'm not too upset as an England fan. We showed attacking zip, finally some excitement and intent. Some sloppy stuff cost them but if this is a new start, new style, good signs. At least it wasn't ball up the forwards jumper stuff.
 

Captainron

Big Hitting, South African Sweary Person
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
6,467
Location
Rural Lincolnshire
Visit site
To be fair to @Bunkermagnet there are 5 Saffas in that squad that I can remember off the top of my head

Van der Merwe, Steyn, Schoeman, Nel and admittedly very occasionally Kebble. That is a fair old whack. Huw Jones learned his professional craft in the Western Cape too.


Now this speaks more about South Africa than Scotland for me.
 

Lord Tyrion

Money List Winner
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
28,716
Location
Northumberland
Visit site
I think the system is wrong in how players can transfer countries and qualify. I never liked it when England were playing South Sea Islanders, the same applies for other nations. Internationals should not be transferable because a better opportunity arises. It isn't club rugby, it shouldn't work that way (I feel the same about other sports as well, cricket being the obvious one)
 

Captainron

Big Hitting, South African Sweary Person
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
6,467
Location
Rural Lincolnshire
Visit site
I think the system is wrong in how players can transfer countries and qualify. I never liked it when England were playing South Sea Islanders, the same applies for other nations. Internationals should not be transferable because a better opportunity arises. It isn't club rugby, it shouldn't work that way (I feel the same about other sports as well, cricket being the obvious one)
General residency rules can’t be changed for sportsmen and women. The exclusion timing from the respective sporting bodies though should be the barrier to this happening. Increase it to 10 years and that would really thin out the changes.
 

D-S

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
3,855
Location
Bristol
Visit site
Are you talking about Geordie Vunipola and Scouse Tuilagi? 😂
The Vunipola brothers went to primary school just down the road from me and went to the local secondary school and played junior rugby for my local club. They have lived in the UK since they were young children, so hardly players qualifying to play on very short term residency.
 

Lord Tyrion

Money List Winner
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
28,716
Location
Northumberland
Visit site
The Vunipola brothers went to primary school just down the road from me and went to the local secondary school and played junior rugby for my local club. They have lived in the UK since they were young children, so hardly players qualifying to play on very short term residency.
Fair play, I didn't dig deeply into the background. Lazy from me. The principle stands though, even if it doesn't apply to those guys.
 

rudebhoy

Q-School Graduate
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
4,882
Location
whitley bay
Visit site
Watched a feature about Bundee Aki yesterday, he qualified for Ireland after 3 years' residency. Assume it's the same for all the 6 nations? A nonsense if so.
 

Doon frae Troon

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
19,009
Location
S W Scotland
Visit site
Some of Saturday's England players seem to have been around for ages.
A few can be described as 'journey men'
Seems to me like the structure needs a wake up call.
With all of those players, facilities and funding at England's disposal so they should be producing something an awful lot better.
With what is at their fingertips they should be the outstanding team in world rugby.
 

Bunkermagnet

Journeyman Pro
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
8,490
Location
Kent
Visit site
Some of Saturday's England players seem to have been around for ages.
A few can be described as 'journey men'
Seems to me like the structure needs a wake up call.
With all of those players, facilities and funding at England's disposal so they should be producing something an awful lot better.
With what is at their fingertips they should be the outstanding team in world rugby.
Considering England have a new coach and direction, and quite a few young players coming in I would be more concerned that Scotland didn't beat them by more, and probably without DvdM would have lost.
 

GB72

Money List Winner
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
14,808
Location
Rutland
Visit site
Some of Saturday's England players seem to have been around for ages.
A few can be described as 'journey men'
Seems to me like the structure needs a wake up call.
With all of those players, facilities and funding at England's disposal so they should be producing something an awful lot better.
With what is at their fingertips they should be the outstanding team in world rugby.

Not sure where some of that comes from. The RFU is skint, the clubs are losing money by the bucket load. For international rugby running less club sides, concentrating talent and reducing costs is a benefit. The home nations get the same amount of money pretty much out of the 6 nations as the TV revenue is split evenly and as the teams have the same international calendar and play similar opposition the levels of overall funding should not be that different.
 

Doon frae Troon

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
19,009
Location
S W Scotland
Visit site
Not sure where some of that comes from. The RFU is skint, the clubs are losing money by the bucket load. For international rugby running less club sides, concentrating talent and reducing costs is a benefit. The home nations get the same amount of money pretty much out of the 6 nations as the TV revenue is split evenly and as the teams have the same international calendar and play similar opposition the levels of overall funding should not be that different.
Do you think England should follow Scotland's example and reduce their professional teams to two. ;) (y)
 
Top