That's cheating, you added an edit, ha ha. I get your point but as a coach would you not say, even in medals, to break down your round into small chunks or targets? To do that you need something to aim for and that is the par for each hole.
I do
But you can change your approach to playing each hole.
If you get a new captain at your club and he changes all the par 5s into par 4s, what difference would it make to the course?
In medal play, I am more aware of my score to my handicap than I am against gross par. On my own course, I know what holes I can perhaps press at if I need a par (net birdie) if I'm adrift and which holes are a case of keeping it in play off the tee, take net par and move on. Of course in the real world, the technique doesn't always align to the sensible thinking but that's why I'm off what I am
It would make it harder in every golfers head. It would remove more of the fun. No one wants their handicap to go up, it is how we are all measured.
For this to work properly you would need every golfer to be rewired.
Is it not possible that the bold bit may actually be why you're off what you are?
In what respect? Can you explain what you mean please
You want to be single figures right?
But you think like a 15 h/capper (No offence meant to 15 hcps}
Do you think many sf golfers settle for a net par on the tee?
Fair comment, and I get what you're saying. How would you change the mindset then, bearing in mind as a mid-handicapper, technique may not be as consistent as I'd like. I can see where being more positive can help, but where do you draw a line between that and making poor decisions and pushing too hard that leads to a card wrecking hole?
Of course it makes a difference. Someone who is 18 handicap gets a shot every hole, irrespective of stroke index. So if he does the hole in five, the par dictates whether he scores 2 or 3 points doesn't it?So the par of the hole has nothing to do with your score
Of course it makes a difference. Someone who is 18 handicap gets a shot every hole, irrespective of stroke index. So if he does the hole in five, the par dictates whether he scores 2 or 3 points doesn't it?
Most people recognise their limitations though. If it's a par 4, 480 yards, stroke index 1, and you know you can't drive more than 240 yards, then you have absolutely zero chance of reaching it in two, and you have no choice but to think in the terms Homer described. Obviously the goal is to get near the green and then up and down to make your par, but you're still going to accept bogey / net par given the distance.Well settling for bogey because it's a shot hole before you've even hit your drive wont help.
Most people recognise their limitations though. If it's a par 4, 480 yards, stroke index 1, and you know you can't drive more than 240 yards, then you have absolutely zero chance of reaching it in two, and you have no choice but to think in the terms Homer described. Obviously the goal is to get near the green and then up and down to make your par, but you're still going to accept bogey / net par given the distance.
I think in that situation you feel more comfortable because you can easily reach the green in three. It doesn't feel like a really difficult hole in your mind so the pressure is less. For example, if you still have 90 yards to go with your third shot, and the pin is in a tricky area, if you're playing it as a par 4 you might feel like you have to go for the pin, whereas with a par 5 you'd maybe take the easier shot to the middle of the green as you know you can two putt for par.How would you approach the hole if it was a par 5?
Well it depends on the hole and how it's set out, but I'd happily go with a comfortable mid-iron on my second shot, if I know I can leave a comfortable short iron on the third shot to get to the green.I'll rephrase the question
If you get 2 shots at the hole, how would you approach it as a par 5
Well it depends on the hole and how it's set out, but I'd happily go with a comfortable mid-iron on my second shot, if I know I can leave a comfortable short iron on the third shot to get to the green.
If it was a par 4, I'd be thinking I need to hit a longer club on my second shot to get as near the green as possible.
Because my long irons are crap!Why would you not hit the longer club for your 2nd shot if the hole was a par 5?
Because my long irons are crap!
You want to be single figures right?
But you think like a 15 h/capper (No offence meant to 15 hcps}
Do you think many sf golfers settle for a net par on the tee?