Val
Ryder Cup Winner
Yes, Dunbar.
Magic course, really enjoyed it
Yes, Dunbar.
You really dont "need 3 good shots" on a par 5.
I'm living proof of that and I'm sure many will agree.
You need a drive that stays on planet earth or at very least one that isn't behind a tree. Make sure you have a 2and shot.
The 2nd shot doesnt have to be brilliant either. Depending on what's about an iron might be the play. If it's safe clip a hybrid or wood. This doesnt have to be the worlds greatest strike. Many a time I've scuffed a 2nd shot up a par 5 and still left myself a semi simple shot to the green.
We have 165 markers and I always try to get my 2nd inside that.
I agree, and I'm the same.
We start with a par 5 and there is a possibility that the 18th will be extended in the next year or so to become a par 5, which would mean we finish with back to back par 5's.
I can also attest that a par 5 opening hole followed by a tough par 3 is not the best recipe for a good pace of play during the early holes!! (especially when its followed by a short par 4 where you have to let players get on the green before teeing off and then a very difficult par 3 which has a significant amount of water.
...and for those who said that clubs need to tell their members to abide by their tee times...you are living in dreamland...its like herding cats.
We've had two weeks of blissful quick golf after restrictions were eased with 2 balls going off at 10 minute intervals. Everyone said what a joy it was. We took away the starters a week or so ago (all club volunteers giving up their own time) and instantly the members treated it like they could tee off whenever they liked and immediately started whinging about slow play because they were instantly up the arse of the group in front. Clueless.
My scores dropped massively this month since I left the 3w and 3h in the car. Not only on the par 5 but also par 4 holes.That's a good point about pace of play.
I guess another reason why par 3s are generally not ideal in the opening few holes.
My feeling is that Par 5s cause problems for a lot of golfers as people will always play their longest club as a second shot - often a fairway wood or 3 hybrid - even if they will never reach the green. This obviously creates potential for bringing trouble into play, rather than thinking of the best tactical area to play to.
My scores dropped massively this month since I left the 3w and 3h in the car. Not only on the par 5 but also par 4 holes.
You have more self control than me. if I am 160 or more out I usually hit a 3h but recently I just topped it and it goes nowhere, leaving me another 160 shot and an extra shot on the card.Same for me last year. Didn't leave them in the car, but play a mid, or even a short iron for 2nd shot on the par 5s.
Longer par 4s have a bit more room to miss, so often worth taking them on, but par 5s are tighter at the green.
From a pace of play perspective a par 3 as the first hole is perfect.
You cant start until the green is clear whether you like it or not.
It provides that 10 minute gap without the need for marshalling
Admittedly, not everyone likes a par 3 to start but it does set the gaps early.
Just pointing out to Imurg that a par 3 isn't a given for a perfect 10 minute gap. It's a given that a 2 ball will go faster than a 4. Our second, is actually an opposite with a par 5 second so in effect it then gives the groups a chance to spread a littleBut a 2 ball off yellows is obviously going to go round the course about an hour or so quicker than a 4 off whites, so not sure what relevance the par of one hole has.
In an ideal world but how often does that happen. Both hit the green off the yellows, two putt and move on - arguably in less than 8 minutes. The 4 go right (where we have OOB) or left (deep rough and a pond) short right towards a line of trees and say two go straight. Potentially at least one reload, some time looking for the balls "in case" and then some time looking for the ball towards the trees. No guarantee of hitting the green in two, so playing three. All the usual faffing on the green and suddenly it's up towards 15 minutes. Not ideal, but seen it happen (and probably been responsible over the years too). Simply pointing out that different scenarios can have a distinct effect on the initial pace. However with the par 5 second, it does seem to even itself and flow from thereSo if your 2 ball off yellows takes 8 minutes to play the hole, then the 4 behind them take 12, both your scenarios, guess what the gap will be.... ?
Voila ?
I agree about the last part. I remember when we had the first meet there and everyone milled about the yellows thinking this doesn't look too shabby until I directed them to the whites. I do think allowing members the choice of which tee they use does add an extra layer to getting people off equally spaced. It does seem to work in practice with the par 5 secondThe point is that there is an instant 1 hole gap between groups.
Pace of play can't really begin until you've actually started so the actual start times become superfluous as you'll probably be a minute or two "late" because the green hasn't cleared.
Once you're away you have that spacing......and let's face it..I doubt there's many clubs that start with a par 3 like yours that adds 50% to the distance yellow to white....