D
Deleted member 23270
Guest
They are my favourite type of hole.Par threes should be banned. I hate them.
They are my favourite type of hole.Par threes should be banned. I hate them.
They are my favourite type of hole.
They are my favourite type of hole.
Interesting comment
Where I play (based upon difficulty) the par 3s are SIs 3,5,7 and 14, not exactly the easiest of holes.
When I set up courses for the county comps I will usually make sure there is nice short one (< 150). It really makes the class players think about their wedge selection and the wind.It's nice to have a mix of lengths too, our par 3s are around 110, 145, 165, 175 & 200+. Another thing I dislike on a course is when all the par 3s are over 170 yards. You need at least one short one in there.
SI 3 is 229 yards steep down hill with a predominant left to right wind (always some sort of wind) 2 tier green one of which is only just big enough for one hole position. OB long and a ticket of trees to the left, green is about 6 ft above the ground on the rightSI 3 ? why is that Jim, length, bunkers, water ?
SI 3 is 229 yards steep down hill with a predominant left to right wind (always some sort of wind) 2 tier green one of which is only just big enough for one hole position. OB long and a ticket of trees to the left, green is about 6 ft above the ground on the right
SI 5 140 -180 is 2 -3 clubs up hill big fall of to the right of the green and the approach has lots of trees lot of slope on the green easy to 3 putt.
SI 7 is around 140 to 180 bunkers short, bunkers left and right played directly in to the predominant wind.
SI 14 is about 130 to 160 a green which falls of markedly on both sides and back with bunker halfway across front left and very deep bunker to the left of the green OB to the left ( I once managed a 10 on this hole in a medal).
The SI does not necessarily mean the order of the most difficult holes, although I think we'd all agree that a 229 yard par-3 is always going to be a challenge. I suspect that some such holes are not really a matter of design intent, but really a way of filling the space between two other holes whose layout is forced by the land.
I once played a scratch match at your place and had a two on the first three par 3s. Didn’t play 15 as I won my match on 14 (15 is the stroke 3). However, I do recall making a 2 at least once on that hole. I’ve also nearly killed somebody that was stood on the 2nd tee.SI 3 is 229 yards steep down hill with a predominant left to right wind (always some sort of wind) 2 tier green one of which is only just big enough for one hole position. OB long and a ticket of trees to the left, green is about 6 ft above the ground on the right
SI 5 140 -180 is 2 -3 clubs up hill big fall of to the right of the green and the approach has lots of trees lot of slope on the green easy to 3 putt.
SI 7 is around 140 to 180 bunkers short, bunkers left and right played directly in to the predominant wind.
SI 14 is about 130 to 160 a green which falls of markedly on both sides and back with bunker halfway across front left and very deep bunker to the left of the green OB to the left ( I once managed a 10 on this hole in a medal).
As said on the original post on the holes the SIs are based upon difficulty,
The one that springs to mind is the 1st at Meyrick Park in Bournemouth. 244 yards off the whites. Then there is the 4th at 242 yards.
The start goes:
1st 244 yard par 3
2nd 309 yard par 4
3rd 469 yard par 4
4th 242 yard par 3
The only shot hole for me during those four holes is the 3rd ?
Well, they should not necessarily be done that way, as balanced stroke allocation is recommended by CONGU and WHS. And there are a variety of methods used to rate difficulty - how were yours done?