Matchplay Shots Given

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
32,404
Visit site
In a club matchplay competition can the players ignore stroke indexing and instead agree the holes that any shots given by one player to the other can be taken.
 

rulefan

Tour Winner
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
14,628
Visit site
Appendix E of the WHS says:
The Rules of Golf state: “The Committee is responsible for publishing on the
scorecard or somewhere else that is visible (for example, near the first tee) the
order of holes at which handicap strokes are to be given or received.” (See Rules of Golf, Committee Procedures, Rule 5I (4)).


Which inter alia says:
Match Play – In a handicap match, the Committee should clarify the following in the Terms of the Competition:
The stroke index allocation to be used to identify the order of holes where players will give or receive handicap strokes.



It seems clear that the players have no choice in the matter.
 
Last edited:

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
32,404
Visit site
Appendix E of the WHS says:
The Rules of Golf state: “The Committee is responsible for publishing on the
scorecard or somewhere else that is visible (for example, near the first tee) the
order of holes at which handicap strokes are to be given or received.” (See Rules of Golf, Committee Procedures, Rule 5I (4)).


Which inter alia says:
Match Play – In a handicap match, the Committee should clarify the following in the Terms of the Competition:
The stroke index allocation to be used to identify the order of holes where players will give or receive handicap strokes.



It seems clear that the players have no choice in the matter
Which is of course exactly as I‘ve always thought, but let’s just say I give one shot. Why could I not give my opponent a shot on a hole that is not SI 1, and he decides to not take it on the SI 1.

@Jason.H…I ask as due to significant ongoing work on the course I will be giving an opponent a shot on our 17th, which is temporarily reduced to a 60yd pitch to the green.

For the sake of the rule question put aside why I might want to seek this from my opponent or what difference it would make.

As suggested I will have a look for the Terms of the Competition.
 
Last edited:

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
32,404
Visit site
As both would have agreed to waive a rule both would be DQd.
Indeed, except the loser wouldnt have anything to be getting DQd from.

But in truth if I am giving one shot in a match who is to tell me that I can’t give my opponent in the match a shot on a hole if I so choose…so if he gets a 4 on the hole I say that it’s a 3 as far as I am concerned, and on the SI 1 hole he declines to take the shot he’s due.

In any competition context other than a singles match of course shots received must be taken on the holes according to SI.

I am being a bit devils advocate about this…however…
 
Last edited:

Jason.H

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2021
Messages
1,209
Location
Midlands
Visit site
Its 18 holes match play, Just bring your A game. Personally if an opponent turned up on the 1st tee and said he wants his shots on x,y and z holes I’d say no and that could then lead to bad feeling possibly. Match play can be stressful without changing things. Or is that your tactic ???
 

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
32,404
Visit site
Its 18 holes match play, Just bring your A game. Personally if an opponent turned up on the 1st tee and said he wants his shots on x,y and z holes I’d say no and that could then lead to bad feeling possibly. Match play can be stressful without changing things. Or is that your tactic ???
I’m not thinking of doing it, but the circumstances made me wonder if I could.

TBH I’m still not sure that in a match a match pair couldn’t actually just decide to ignore the formal giving/receiving of shots and just agree between themselves holes where shots are given/received. There have been plenty of discussions on here where things can be different in matchplay. So for instance is there any rule that says that in a match the shots that can be given/received according to handicaps MUST be given and received.

If the conditions were utterly rubbish we might just say on the 1st…let’s just play it off scratch. It‘s an agreement made between the competitors that impacts no other player - unless there is a rule that tells us that such an agreement is not allowed in matchplay.
 

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
32,404
Visit site
Just make it up as you go along why not?
In a match I can choose to ignore rule breaches by my opponent if I so choose, as likewise can he choose to ignore any rule breach I might commit. And so I am simply asking for a Rule that prohibits what I suggest.
 

rulie

Head Pro
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
1,904
Visit site
In a match I can choose to ignore rule breaches by my opponent if I so choose, as likewise can he choose to ignore any rule breach I might commit. And so I am simply asking for a Rule that prohibits what I suggest.
Again, what do the Terms of the Competition say about how strokes will be applied? Players must not deviate from those Terms or they may be dq’d.
 

Steven Rules

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 18, 2022
Messages
582
Visit site
In a match I can choose to ignore rule breaches by my opponent if I so choose, as likewise can he choose to ignore any rule breach I might commit. And so I am simply asking for a Rule that prohibits what I suggest.
OK, try these then:

3.2c(2)
Each player is responsible for knowing the holes where they give or get handicap strokes, based on the stroke index allocation set by the Committee (which is usually found on the scorecard).

3.2d(4)
...if the player and opponent agree not to apply the Rules ....... and either of those players has started the round, they are both disqualified under Rule 1.3b.

Although, having said that, 3.2c(2) does go on to contemplate inadvertent failure to apply handicap strokes correctly:

If the players fail to apply or mistakenly apply handicap strokes on a hole, the agreed result of the hole stands, unless the players correct that mistake in time

But, rather than trying to be sneaky or tricky, or trying to outsmart everybody else by looking for loopholes, why not just play in the spirit of the game as required by Rule 1.2a:

Conduct Expected of All Players
All players are expected to play in the spirit of the game by:
Acting with integrity – for example, by following the Rules
 

rulefan

Tour Winner
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
14,628
Visit site
In a match I can choose to ignore rule breaches by my opponent if I so choose, as likewise can he choose to ignore any rule breach I might commit. And so I am simply asking for a Rule that prohibits what I suggest.
The players cannot agree to breach the rules 3.2d(4)
 

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
32,404
Visit site
OK, try these then:

3.2c(2)
Each player is responsible for knowing the holes where they give or get handicap strokes, based on the stroke index allocation set by the Committee (which is usually found on the scorecard).

3.2d(4)
...if the player and opponent agree not to apply the Rules ....... and either of those players has started the round, they are both disqualified under Rule 1.3b.

Although, having said that, 3.2c(2) does go on to contemplate inadvertent failure to apply handicap strokes correctly:

If the players fail to apply or mistakenly apply handicap strokes on a hole, the agreed result of the hole stands, unless the players correct that mistake in time

But, rather than trying to be sneaky or tricky, or trying to outsmart everybody else by looking for loopholes, why not just play in the spirit of the game as required by Rule 1.2a:

Conduct Expected of All Players
All players are expected to play in the spirit of the game by:
Acting with integrity – for example, by following the Rules
I’m not trying to be sneaky or tricky…I’m just wondering what the rules say. And this from 3.2c(2) indicates to me that what I am asking about is a failure to apply a stroke on a hole, no mention of deliberate, result of hole would stand, and so in respect of the rules we’d be OK.

And on integrity, I fail to see how doing something in a knockout matchplay context that is agreed by both parties and does not break any rule can in any way be outside the spirit of the game. Indeed it might be fully in accordance with the spirit of the game.
 
Last edited:
Top