IanM
Journeyman Pro
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 14,944
- Location
- Monmouthshire, UK via Guildford!
No, it's just the reaction to 40 years of political arrogance......
The problem IMO is that our negotiators have been hamstrung due to the calls to take No Deal off the table and the weakness of the way May has carried out negotiations. This is aggravated by MPs working against the democratic vote.
We should have insisted that the withdraw agreement and future trade arrangements were negotiated together and should not be seperated. If we had already agreed a Free Trade Arrangement then the problems with the Irish border would be negated. We also have the leverage of how and when we pay the withdraw settlement. I dont believe there would ever be the No Deal that so many fear as it's in all parties interest to maintain trade, we keep hearing scare stories suggesting that all trade would cease and we would never see a lettuce or toilet roll again, it's all project fear and rather condescending propaganda.
True. You'd like to think that out of this omnishables will emerge a new way of doing politics that is fit for purpose. It takes into account how society now operates and how people want to feel they are represented, not just discarded as being irrelevant in a first past the post system where many constituencies never really change. Where we face the big challenges such as the environment, automation of many traditional jobs and the rise of new economic powerhouses.
Only joking, it will likely lead to more and more power crazed ideologues, creating fear where none should really exist, appealing to everyone's bassist instincts and herd mentalities and promising unachievable outcomes as long as you vote for them.
The whole electoral system has a lot to answer for imo. If those that voted UKIP had a voice in parliament their collective vote total deserved there would have been no need for Cameron, or anyone else, to promise a bloody referendum. I am quite sure, because of the 2 party system, many people who would have added their vote to the UKIP total felt it was a wasted vote and demurred to one of the others. If we had a form of PR those who voted UKIP would have been represented proportionately to the strength of feeling at the time. Who knows, they may even have been invited to help form a coalition. Cameron, wrongly imo, assumed most UKIP votes were from ex Tory voters and the rest, as they say, is history.
About 15 years ago there was a referendum about the system. I can’t really remember who was for and who was against it in since of campaigning.
People voted against it because it wasn’t well understood. Maybe it is time to give it another go.
About 15 years ago there was a referendum about the system. I can’t really remember who was for and who was against it in since of campaigning.
People voted against it because it wasn’t well understood. Maybe it is time to give it another go.
It was 2011. It was a version of Alternative Vote, not proportional Representation. The Tories whipped up the media and it was lost. When Labour were in power just before then they also blocked it. Whichever party that is in power doesn't want it, making it incredibly hard to get it through. It only got in last time because Cameron had to agree it with the LibDems to get them into bed in a coalition.
The UK needs it but no party in power will push it.
I'm sure Sturgeon would be over the moon if proportional representation was ever adopted by the UK.![]()
The reason the UK and the US are stuck in outdated systems is because you haven’t lost a war ;-)The UK needs it but no party in power will push it.
The reason the UK and the US are stuck in outdated systems is because you haven’t lost a war ;-)
Look at the fine and fairly modern constitution you guys made the Germans write.
The EU is even newer and has a better system as well.
You can't go posting sensible stuff like thatIs PR a bad thing? It shouldn't be about which politicians like it, it should be about whats best for the UK.
Well, allies are allies, and they spoke the same language anyway. But Germany lost a war and ended up with a more modern constitution and electoral system.We didn't make the Germans write a new constitution. The US, as part of the Marshall Plan for handing over $1444bn for rebuilding insisted on it.
Well, allies are allies, and they spoke the same language anyway. But Germany lost a war and ended up with a more modern constitution and electoral system.
They were given a bunch of money to modernise
I'd be happier if Sturgeon was sent to the Moon.
Well, allies are allies, and they spoke the same language anyway. But Germany lost a war and ended up with a more modern constitution and electoral system.