DanFST
Head Pro
EDIT. Just googled it and the use of a cycle path is not mandatory.
Who the ruddy hell thought that was a good idea! I did not know that at all.
EDIT. Just googled it and the use of a cycle path is not mandatory.
You were the one that objected to my post, surely you should know!
I don't know numbers or anything, but the one that says about riding two abreast apart from certain situations.
Ha... the law does state that its ok but as you point out, there is very little chance of the driver getting hurt even if they smash directly into you. It might be an idea to use your head, get out of the way and the motorist will not feel the need to chop you hard when he/she pass you.
There have been 6 cyclist fatalities this year, lets not have any more because of the arrogance of cyclists who feel they need to teach motorists what the law is over what is smart.
Why are cyclists arrogant because they ride two a breast ? They have just as much a right on the road as a car.
Why should a cyclist "get out of the way" just because a car wants to get past ?
http://ukcyclelaws.blogspot.co.uk/p/the-laws-according-to-highway-code.html?m=1You were the one that objected to my post, surely you should know!
I don't know numbers or anything, but the one that says about riding two abreast apart from certain situations.
Why wouldn't they have a right to be on the road ? Unless the law has changed ?
I'm assuming this response is a windup?
Bus drivers thinking they have a right to pull out as soon as they indicate. I have serious anger issues with this!
I'm assuming this response is a windup?
Taken from .gov:
You should
keep both hands on the handlebars except when signalling or changing gear
keep both feet on the pedals
never ride more than two abreast, and ride in single file on narrow or busy roads and when riding round bends
not ride close behind another vehicle
not carry anything which will affect your balance or may get tangled up with your wheels or chain
be considerate of other road users, particularly blind and partially sighted pedestrians. Let them know you are there when necessary, for example, by ringing your bell if you have one. It is recommended that a bell be fitted.
Absolutely not.
Because they pay nothing toward the upkeep of the roads. While i pay over 300 pounds a year to drive my big 4x4. Ergo, they should get out of my way so i can drive my kids to school.
http://ukcyclelaws.blogspot.co.uk/p/the-laws-according-to-highway-code.html?m=1
You said they are breaking the law
It is legal to cycle two a breast but at times they are asked to show common sense on certain roads.
Next time you go impatiently bombing past a cyclist 6 inches from your wing mirror, just remember you are in a big metal box and we have bugger all protection.
If cyclists ride 2 abreast, it forces drivers to slow down and go round us when there is no oncoming traffic.
There are plenty of vehicles for which the road tax is zero!
Pity because with that sort of attitude you shouldn't be behind the wheel of a car.
Again you are wrong. The link was off the GOV site rooter posted a minute ago. Rule 66.
I assume this is a wind up?