Crazyface
Tour Winner
They've just introduced a three scores in comps rule at ours. Not sure if senior comps are allowed but no matter I don't play in weekend comps. It's very liberating.?
I think we have to have had 3 qualifiers in the last 12 months
I Just had a look at our last 4 comps which include 2 board comps and the june and july montly medal. all of the winners had played in 3 qualifiers within the last couple of months and hadnt won anything in the previous 6 months , so thats nice to see regular players having their moment in the winners circle.
However there are rumblings about some of the club knock outs . my mate got hammered 7&6 (i know it happens) by someone who's last qualifier was sept last year and only played 3 in total during 2021 , so im not sure how that works
This was my biggest fear with WHS.How does the need to put in a certain amount of cards make the Handicap of someone who is manipulating the system suddenly accurate?
If I wanted to win more by having an index higher than my ability, I would be entering more cards not less.
This is a bit like the 'High handicappers win everything' debate - when people look at the numbers and percentages of categories most handicap levels win their fair share. I would also guess that those who enter very few competitions lose more competitions than regular competition players. The serial offenders will only welcome more not less cards.
This was my biggest fear with WHS.
Put in a minimum amount false cap.
Put in loads so you can manipulate a false cap.
No system is perfect but at the moment it’s easy for anyone to fiddle the system to have the cap they want.
Not the one they should have. It’s a problem imo.
Its a good point, in a month there seems to be one every other weekend, and 2 or 3 seniors comps in a month, but we also have 9 hole comps every week (yep 9 hole comps going towards your WHS)Doesn't sound like there are many qualifying comps going on at yours, that could be a big part of the problem.
Isn’t the point in the WHS that you put a card in every time you play. I do so my handicap is representative of how I am playing.
I personally don’t understand why more people don’t, putting out makes it slower isn’t an excuse. If you are worried about a 2 foot putt it shouldn’t be a gimme.
It also means for me I don’t care how I perform in a competition any more as I’m not worried about a change in my handicap so I actually have better scores. My lowest ever coming in a medal
Not that I'm aware off. Personally I can never be bothered outside of a competition it doesn't really suit my golf which is often peripatetic, wandering around the course.Isn’t the point in the WHS that you put a card in every time you play.
It only takes care of those who are genuine high handicappers to start with, then have lessons and 5 months of practise without putting any cards in, come back and score 46 points. It doesn't do anything for handicap manipulators obviously, as they need to put cards in to manipulate it anyway.How does the need to put in a certain amount of cards make the Handicap of someone who is manipulating the system suddenly accurate?
If I wanted to win more by having an index higher than my ability, I would be entering more cards not less.
This is a bit like the 'High handicappers win everything' debate - when people look at the numbers and percentages of categories most handicap levels win their fair share. I would also guess that those who enter very few competitions lose more competitions than regular competition players. The serial offenders will only welcome more not less cards.
I know how they feel.Not wanting to go off topic, but at the end of todays round whilst sat at the 19th three of the lads we’re talking about the opens they have been in recently. They were talking about two lads from another club that have won 3 comps as a pairs. They were basically questioning there handicaps. apparently they were not the only ones when they were at the courses. The point was raised re how many Q scores they had to qualify. Apparently it was the bare minimum hence there hcap was questionable. Listening to the lads they were over the moon re the courses they had played and the cost paid. But folk turning up with dodgy questionable chaps went down like a fart in a spacesuit.
Not wanting to go off topic, but at the end of todays round whilst sat at the 19th three of the lads we’re talking about the opens they have been in recently. They were talking about two lads from another club that have won 3 comps as a pairs. They were basically questioning there handicaps. apparently they were not the only ones when they were at the courses. The point was raised re how many Q scores they had to qualify. Apparently it was the bare minimum hence there hcap was questionable. Listening to the lads they were over the moon re the courses they had played and the cost paid. But folk turning up with dodgy questionable chaps went down like a fart in a spacesuit.
I don’t know the answer, but again if folk play the minimum amount of comps to get a handicap. Would or could there hcap still be “ artificial”. One thing that could help is Open comps are WHS score comps.Simple solution is for clubs to run Opens as singles comps.
We require a minimum of 5 competition cards submitted in the previous 12 months in order to be eligible to win a board (major) comp. This rule would have led to an awkward conversation on our Captain's Day, as I won on countback, but had it been the other way round the committe would have had to tell the other player he didn't win due to not having enough cards in.
I believe this rule is not enforced for matchplay competitions though
Simple solution is for clubs to run Opens as singles comps.