Kellfire
Blackballed
Defend that. Embarrassing.
So we on here are understanding some what should be simple things in the statement differently. 3offtheTee thinks I could go, you don’t - I don’t think I should be able to go - but the PM said I could go to the park and sit on a park bench. Do I have to walk to the park to sit on the bench or can I drive as I can if I am to exercise - and if the park I want to go to to sit on a park bench is 170miles away?
Stern tone; Stern face; Clench fists; Wave hands. Confuse.
I think I might use this cartoon a lot on this site....Reckon it’s great that a worldwide crisis has brought the United Kingdom together as one as we battle through it all.
Its simple advice.it’s not about you being able to understand it it’s about the other bellends who haven’t listened to the current advice let alone being told they have more freedom than they thought they did before
H'mm! Isn't that the epitome of 'conservative'? Note the small 'c'!What about those of us that arnt die hard Torys and are sensible enough to realise that's what we have and where appropriate have to get on and deal with it.
To be fair, you know the answer, you have suggested as much. We all really know how the rules or guidelines work, people just look to bend them to suit. If you are stretching something to the nth degree then you know that your interpretation of the rules is questionable. (Please do not take my use of you or your as being directed at you. I am using it in general terms ?)So we on here are understanding some what should be simple things in the statement differently. 3offtheTee thinks I could go, you don’t - I don’t think I should be able to go - but the PM said I could go to the park and sit on a park bench. Do I have to walk to the park to sit on the bench or can I drive as I can if I am to exercise - and if the park I want to go to to sit on a park bench is 170miles away?
Stern tone; Stern face; Clench fists; Wave hands. Confuse.
So you suggest they wait and respond?
(Please do not take my use of you or your as being directed at you. I am using it in general terms ?)
The problem is people are and will definitely from this week, bend the rules as much as possible. In the case SILH gives I wouldn't class a 170 mile trip (assume that's 340 miles in both directions) as essential even for a 90th birthday and if the police were to stop him for any reason I would suggest they wouldn't see it as such. Not a pick at SILH and I am certain there are far worse examples out there. The issue as I see it in a very simple basis is the more interaction we have, even at work with PPE or government advice followed (or not) then the R number is going to rise as is happening in Germany and we're either back to a lockdown similar to the one we have (or more severe even) and more hospital admissions and deaths increasingTo be fair, you know the answer, you have suggested as much. We all really know how the rules or guidelines work, people just look to bend them to suit. If you are stretching something to the nth degree then you know that your interpretation of the rules is questionable. (Please do not take my use of you or your as being directed at you. I am using it in general terms ?)
OK - Boris Johnson is Prime Minister of THE UNITED KINGDOM. So how about the other three areas stop doing their own thing?
Yes.
And return the same day, enjoy your trip.Does sound like it’s fine for us to be driving the 170miles or so to my M-I-Ls next week to see her on her 90th birthday - then pop 25miles up the road to Sheffield to see our son.
I think you're splitting hairs there. Imo it shouldve been right we propose x,y and z then they voted on the course of Action and ran with it as a whole nation.
This course of action will just divide us.
Depends whether small c conservatives are thought of the same way by those that think Tory stands for right wing extremists.H'mm! Isn't that the epitome of 'conservative'? Note the small 'c'!
Are you suggesting a referendum?