Junior
Tour Winner
Probably been done before, but I'd like to reopen the debate and gauge opinion before our AGM. The club I play at has 3 categories of membership , 5, 6 and 7 day (there are reduced fee's for juniors, certain age brackets too). The 6 day members can play on the non competition day at the weekend.
Over the past few years, we have seen a migration by 7 day members to 5 or 6 day membership. These members are mostly retired as you would imagine, and they play pretty much every day. 7 day members , generally, work full time, have families and don't play as much. The 5 and 6 day fee's are pro-rata that of 7 day.
So, is it fair to charge those who use the facilities a lot less, more for their membership ? Or, is this the wrong way to look at it ? Yes, I know a 7 day member COULD play, but regrettably, work and family prevent this.
And finally, Do your clubs have similar fee structures , or, do they just have one category of membership ?
Thanks for your input.
Over the past few years, we have seen a migration by 7 day members to 5 or 6 day membership. These members are mostly retired as you would imagine, and they play pretty much every day. 7 day members , generally, work full time, have families and don't play as much. The 5 and 6 day fee's are pro-rata that of 7 day.
So, is it fair to charge those who use the facilities a lot less, more for their membership ? Or, is this the wrong way to look at it ? Yes, I know a 7 day member COULD play, but regrettably, work and family prevent this.
And finally, Do your clubs have similar fee structures , or, do they just have one category of membership ?
Thanks for your input.
Last edited: