rulefan
Tour Winner
IanMcC
I agree with db7; use the playing handicap. Incidentally do you you currently use 15/18 of handicap?
I agree with db7; use the playing handicap. Incidentally do you you currently use 15/18 of handicap?
Yeah, that is why I mentioned that point, as the comment I was replying to also made reference to this statementThe Clause you mentioned above makes a specific point on this.
G2.1b/1
For multi-tee or mixed-tee competitions the Handicap Allowance may include additional strokes for players who play from the tees with the higher Course Ratings. Players should be aware that under these circumstances any additional strokes they receive could affect when they pick up on a hole in certain formats, for example Stableford or Par/Bogey.
The 15 hole comps are only in the Winter. No, we have never used 15/18ths of handicap.IanMcC
I agree with db7; use the playing handicap. Incidentally do you you currently use 15/18 of handicap?
I came back this country in 2005 from Southern Africa where I had played all my golf (never played golf in the UK). I joined my local Club and I was shocked by two aspects of golf here - the overwhelming percentage of medal to Stableford games and the CONGU HC system and my first post on this forum was to that effect. So what you ask?
The response I got back then clearly indicated that the majority on here believed that 1. All other countries has the same HC system 2. Medal predominated over Stableford because that was necessary for HC purposes. So what you ask again?
I have just seen a demo on the WHC system by Intelligent golf and it looks like this system (WHCS) is the same HC system I played in southern Africa which (loosely) was the best diffs on the best 8 games from the last 20 (the last 20 x 18 holes anywhere including social games). So what you ask for a third time?
Having lived in umpteen countries before returning here I was shocked at how we (English) believe we invented it (everything) and we know best! Up you CONGU
I came back this country in 2005 from Southern Africa where I had played all my golf (never played golf in the UK). I joined my local Club and I was shocked by two aspects of golf here - the overwhelming percentage of medal to Stableford games and the CONGU HC system and my first post on this forum was to that effect. So what you ask?
The response I got back then clearly indicated that the majority on here believed that 1. All other countries has the same HC system 2. Medal predominated over Stableford because that was necessary for HC purposes. So what you ask again?
I have just seen a demo on the WHC system by Intelligent golf and it looks like this system (WHCS) is the same HC system I played in southern Africa which (loosely) was the best diffs on the best 8 games from the last 20 (the last 20 x 18 holes anywhere including social games). So what you ask for a third time?
Having lived in umpteen countries before returning here I was shocked at how we (English) believe we invented it (everything) and we know best! Up you CONGU
2. Medal predominated over Stableford because that was necessary for HC purposes.
When courses are rated, I'm guessing each hole is rated and then calculated to give a course rating.
Therefore will each hole have a difficulty rating, and therefore a new SI assigned? (possibly?)
There is no decree/mandate in the WHS which replaces any of the many methods used to establish the allocation of Stroke Indices.When courses are rated, I'm guessing each hole is rated and then calculated to give a course rating.
Therefore will each hole have a difficulty rating, and therefore a new SI assigned? (possibly?)
It is the club that sets the SIs. There is a laid down procedure in The Rules of Handicapping and the club does not have to change what it has set already.
SI's are not strictly set based on absolute hole difficulty. Difficulty is a primary factor, but they are meant to be spread out, and avoid low stroke indexes on 1st hole (and 10th potentially). This is because their main purpose is for Match Play, and indicating when players get shots. Spreading them out ensures the shot holes are spread out, and avoiding a low index on the first is to help avoid someone of a marginally higher handicap getting a shot on a play off hole.Why i was asking was, out of interest I took all the comps this year and actually worked out the holes actual playing difficulty. Most of them were good, a couple holes different to their actual SI (and i'm sure if I did another years worth of data it would get closer). However 2 holes were way adrift playing +4 easier on SI and -5 on SI more difficult. Me I would just swap the holes SI's around (they are both on the back 9). I was hoping WHS might sort...
There are presently two major ways clubs in CONGU allocate SIs. The 'old' way - based on difficulty and the new - based on significance of position in match play.I was hoping WHS might sort...
SI's are not strictly set based on absolute hole difficulty. Difficulty is a primary factor, but they are meant to be spread out, and avoid low stroke indexes on 1st hole (and 10th potentially). This is because their main purpose is for Match Play, and indicating when players get shots. Spreading them out ensures the shot holes are spread out, and avoiding a low index on the first is to help avoid someone of a marginally higher handicap getting a shot on a play off hole.
Although, I understand there may be new recommendations?
On a side note, wouldn't it be more sensible to allocate shpts on the holes where your handicap differs? You are a 8 handicap and your opponent is 12. Wouldn't it be better to give the shots on SI 9-12?
SI's are not strictly set based on absolute hole difficulty. Difficulty is a primary factor, but they are meant to be spread out, and avoid low stroke indexes on 1st hole (and 10th potentially). This is because their main purpose is for Match Play, and indicating when players get shots. Spreading them out ensures the shot holes are spread out, and avoiding a low index on the first is to help avoid someone of a marginally higher handicap getting a shot on a play off hole.
Although, I understand there may be new recommendations?
The Playing Conditions Calculation does much the same job. It is calculated from and applied to all scores returned by midnight on the day.Likely covered already in this thread so apologies for asking, but what's the deal with the equivalent of CSS on the new system to account for weather? I'm thinking of joining a links course next year and it can really blow at times (east coast Scotland).....is the new system as flexible as CSS in accounting for crazy conditions?!