Another tick for Bridgestone when I'd already decided to go for them next year.
Yeah I watched it. He basically says it's impossible to tell whether the thin layer of paint makes any difference to flight, which I think we all suspected.There is a rick shiels review of the Wilson raw ball on you tube.
Are you saying its a gimmick and I should cancel my order of 10 dozen!!Yeah I watched it. He basically says it's impossible to tell whether the thin layer of paint makes any difference to flight, which I think we all suspected.
I'm saying they've skipped painting them to save money on production, then made up some hogwash about it affecting flight so they can still charge 40 quid.Are you saying its a gimmick and I should cancel my order of 10 dozen!!
According to Rick, he'd change one every 3-4 holes so, assuming you didn't lose any, your 400 quid will last you about 25ish rounds...Are you saying its a gimmick and I should cancel my order of 10 dozen!!
I'll get them off golf depot for 12 quid a doz eventually.It's one thing trying to charge 40 quid, it's another to actually sell them...
I can't imagine (m)any players who buy premium balls going for Wilson at the same price as the established others.
tbf ive used GD loads of time without a problem.You mean you'll order and maybe you'll get them...? ?
Being unconvinced is fine, but not sure that is a reasonable comparison. A two-piece ionomer ball and a four-piece urethane ball if I'm not mistaken.James Robinson has done a review too
Remain unconvinced and definitely unconvinced at that price. For me it's another for the mid-range market like the Tour Soft and should be priced accordingly. I don't see what it brings to the table to make it a premium ball
Being unconvinced is fine, but not sure that is a reasonable comparison. A two-piece ionomer ball and a four-piece urethane ball if I'm not mistaken.
Yeah, it's four-piece urethane so they're chancing their arm and pricing it the same as the other top urethane balls - unfortunately Wilson doesn't have the name to compete with Titleist, Callaway or TaylorMade so it will crash and burn. It probably is a good ball but no one will choose it over another established premium name.I take your point but there is nothing about this ball that seems to be shouting premium and I think it'll take a lot of PR work from Wilson to make any dent in the market. It'll definitely come down n price in my opinion and end up the top end of the mid-range perhaps nearer the Tour Speed which is urethane covered and comes in around £36 (or less)
FG Tour was a good ball, a tad short if I remember but much cheaper than ProVs et al. Came out in 2014 or thereabouts
Wilson were a really big name in golf, not sure when it went wrong but they went from producing irons for Tour players to making starter sets.
Brand is recovering and they've been making good stuff for some years now.
I think they still suffer from being labelled as a lesser brand, along the lines of Slazenger ( once another top brand)
Wonder if there was a malfunction in the paint shop and they were left with a few hundred thousand unpainted balls .......
Just sayin' ....................