jim8flog
Journeyman Pro
Is the suspension reasonable? is open to interpretation. Where I play one member got himself thrown out of the club for alleging financial impropriety without having the evidence to back it up.
I missed that bitBut the op said he called the president a lair and used colorful language so why would you assume it was civil?
Interesting, even though he is a fully paid up member and has paid county subs?Also worth noting- whilst you are suspended you do not have a handicap.
I think we covered this at the time and I can't really remember if there was any end decision. The club would argue that you have committed to being a member of the club for 12 months, you have agreed to pay the fees. What happened, Covid, would then be looked at as exceptional circumstance and they are within their right to expect people to continue to pay. If you don't then they could go after you, problematic and perhaps costly, but at the minimum you would cease to be a member and they could blacklist you going forward.They are charging you for a service that they are stopping you using, I would be surprised if that’s legal.
Interesting, even though he is a fully paid up member and has paid county subs?
I think we covered this at the time and I can't really remember if there was any end decision. The club would argue that you have committed to being a member of the club for 12 months, you have agreed to pay the fees. What happened, Covid, would then be looked at as exceptional circumstance and they are within their right to expect people to continue to pay. If you don't then they could go after you, problematic and perhaps costly, but at the minimum you would cease to be a member and they could blacklist you going forward.
I would argue against that, if I'm suspended but been told that I still have to pay my subs then I think that makes me a member.Basic CONGU rule to have a CONGU handicap you must be a member of a club. Whilst a member is suspended they are not a member of that club.
Yeah, you're a member who isn't allowed to use the clubs facilitiesI would argue against that, if I'm suspended but been told that I still have to pay my subs then I think that makes me a member.
Be aware that if a DD or other regular payment scheme is set up to pay your annual membership fee in instalments, then it is quite possible that you remain liable for the full amount that is outstanding if you choose to leave. If membership is on a month-by-month basis (unlikely) then that liability may not apply.
But if the club are citing a legal document as justification for their actions then they should let members see it imo.
If you asked and was refused that’s poor.
I fully understand the point, we covered it a lot at the time. It was tough for clubs and members, I was putting the clubs, general, side of things forward to give a little balance to the point that clubchamp was making. His point is entirely fair but we would have lost a good number of clubs had that actually happened en masse.This isnt a unique issue, I know members at other clubs that are annoyed with the clubs stance during lockdown and general theme of taking members for granted.
*** is a nice enough course, the sort of place that 30 years ago you'd have to wait or someone to die before getting a chance being a member.
Indeed - one way to aim for inclusivity. I deliberately kept my post general - but I suspect that OP's club is a full membership club - and not of the pay-by-month category. Without looking it might be.My course is monthly, cancel when you want, and they didnt take payments through lockdown/ course closure. We're really going for the inclusivity approach and "get people into golf" and manage to do well with the system we have! But I do appreciate not every club is the same!
It is, and I may be missing the point somewhat here, but I am not actually all that sure what the relevance of seeing the letter is. In a legal dispute, you would surely want your OWN legal advice, rather than just accepting legal advice given to the other party as being fact - in any ongoing dispute, it would be for a court to determine the correct interpretation, not the club's advisors, so seeing what was in the letter is largely meaningless.
Indeed - one way to aim for inclusivity. I deliberately kept my post general - but I suspect that OP's club is a full membership club - and not of the pay-by-month category. Without looking it might be.
Surely that ship has sailed though.I certainly wasn't suggesting that. You crack on, as me personally I couldn't careless if you say the club name or not.
Was thinking more about the fact you said you don't wish to leave the club.