UKIP a change on the political horizon or not.

[Old Skier]

 

[Deleted member 15344]

View attachment 12607

It's a clash of the unmovable forces

Thankfully UKIP will wither away after the next election

 

[Foxholer]

Groan! How about the BBC

Where in that, four and a half year old, report does it show any evidence that immigrants per se - as opposed to more needy ( e.g. homeless) - get priority?!

That Somalian family - of 7 in a 1 bedroom place - indicates quite the opposite!

 

[Ethan]

I am not aware of that being a part of this conversation and have no particular interest in the subject. If you want to discuss it then start up another thread.

I see you are a true loyal Daily Wail reader, only interested in their tired old rhetoric and completely unconcerned with hypocrisy.

You whine about a welfare seeker or immigrant who gets £50 off the Govt but have no concern about a billionaire born in the UK who avoids paying tax in this country by claiming non-dom status and denying his UK citizenship.

For other readers, this refers to Jonathan Harmsworth, aka Viscount Rothermere, owner of the Daily Wail, who claims non-com status and the Daily Wail group avoids tax by channeling revenue through a chain of offshore companies so pays virtually no UK tax. Truly the paper for patriotic hypocrites.

 

[Foxholer]

I see you are a true loyal Daily Wail reader, only interested in their tired old rhetoric and completely unconcerned with hypocrisy.
...

I'd pick more Torygraph - there's some subtlety I'd not naturally associate with DM-ers!

His Wife probably prefers the Mail though!

 

[Deleted member 15344]

Seems a recent trend is judging people by what paper they read

What is someone who doesn't read papers or just read the sports of the gossip etc etc blah blah

What next - judging people on what telly channel they watch or the colour of their socks or their hair or if they are l eft handed etc etc

Quite pathetic really isn't it

 

[Ethan]

Seems a recent trend is judging people by what paper they read

What is someone who doesn't read papers or just read the sports of the gossip etc etc blah blah

What next - judging people on what telly channel they watch or the colour of their socks or their hair or if they are l eft handed etc etc

Quite pathetic really isn't it

Oh, it isn't just what paper he reads. But the paper that people read does say something about their attitude and preferences.

Socks, not so much.

Left handedness or hair colour, not really.

 

[c1973]

Oh, it isn't just what paper he reads. But the paper that people read does say something about their attitude and preferences.

Socks, not so much.

Left handedness or hair colour, not really.

Well, with the exception of gingers obviously, because they have no souls and the over freckly ones are creepy bar stewards!

 

[Old Skier]

Well, with the exception of gingers obviously, because they have no souls and the over freckly ones are creepy bar stewards!

I could link you to a ginger thread which could change your mind

 

[Deleted member 15344]

Well, with the exception of gingers obviously, because they have no souls and the over freckly ones are creepy bar stewards!

They are just a step below left handed golfers - believe only one of each should be allowed membership of a golf club

 

[c1973]

I could link you to a ginger thread which could change your mind

I've probably seen it........for research obviously.

 

[c1973]

They are just a step below left handed golfers - believe only one of each should be allowed membership of a golf club

The left handed ginger match play trophy, the only board comp you don't want to win!

 

[Old Skier]

Second most popular paper getting a bit of a slagging. Must be a few sad guardian readers about.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...m_by_circulation#Circulations_2010_to_present

 

[Deleted member 15344]

The left handed ginger match play trophy, the only board comp you don't want to win!

But thankfully the board for that is in the disabled toilet above the throne

 

[Deleted member 15344]

Second most popular paper getting a bit of a slagging. Must be a few sad guardian readers about.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...m_by_circulation#Circulations_2010_to_present

Popularity doesnt automatically mean quality - look at the disgusting rag at the top of the list

 

[Old Skier]

Looking at the figures, apart from the boobs and bum brigade only Tory's have the required intelligence to read the morning paper

 

[Foxholer]

Second most popular paper getting a bit of a slagging. Must be a few sad guardian readers about.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...m_by_circulation#Circulations_2010_to_present

Oh yes! Forgot that other bastion of tolerance when I stated (wrongly) that DM was #1!

 

[Ethan]

Looking at the figures, apart from the boobs and bum brigade only Tory's have the required intelligence to read the morning paper

Or

Only Tories are still stuck in the 20th century, or in some cases, the 19th. The trendy lefties read the Grauniad on their iPads.

 

[Old Skier]

Or

Only Tories are still stuck in the 20th century, or in some cases, the 19th. The trendy lefties read the Grauniad on their iPads.

There are trendy lefties. When did that happen.

As the readership of papers are so low, anyone that decides what politics any particular reader must be barking anyway.

 

[PhilTheFragger]

Or

Only Tories are still stuck in the 20th century, or in some cases, the 19th. The trendy lefties read the Grauniad on their iPads.

Methinks Ethan reads Private Eye