Neilds
Assistant Pro
And in English?Hhe is always metagaming it. As a producer they will …
And in English?Hhe is always metagaming it. As a producer they will …
At the round table when they have all locked in their vote. The first contestant to reveal their vote it is always set to make the voting the most tension. Quite often when the voting starts it looks like someone is going to get voted off but it then swings onto another who actually goes. I assume there are cameras watching each person as the write on the slate to to work out the best starting place.He knows who is what based on how the producers are showing it to the audience. The contestants could work it out the same way.
In earlier series the people on the chopping block came to breakfast last, that way they should be known as faithful.
This year he said that the last 2 in cages are faithful because that keeps the tension for the TV viewer.
He also said before that the traitors are always a diverse group. For example in celebrities, when all women but Kat had been killed of or banished it was clear she is a traitor as the bbc can’t go with an all men group.
Basically, if you know how TV works you get more out of the setup than the actual contestant behaviour.
Jo Marler’s thought process showed some understanding of the Producers’ needs too. His ‘Big Dog’ theory was along these lines. All the contestants have studied earlier seasons (there are enough of them out there) so they should be using this to inform their game play.He knows who is what based on how the producers are showing it to the audience. The contestants could work it out the same way.
In earlier series the people on the chopping block came to breakfast last, that way they should be known as faithful.
This year he said that the last 2 in cages are faithful because that keeps the tension for the TV viewer.
He also said before that the traitors are always a diverse group. For example in celebrities, when all women but Kat had been killed of or banished it was clear she is a traitor as the bbc can’t go with an all men group.
Basically, if you know how TV works you get more out of the setup than the actual contestant behaviour.
I don’t know. We quite often find ourselves asking whether any of them have actually watched the show before, their grasp of the producers requirement for cliffhangers being a bit lacking.Jo Marler’s thought process showed some understanding of the Producers’ needs too. His ‘Big Dog’ theory was along these lines. All the contestants have studied earlier seasons (there are enough of them out there) so they should be using this to inform their game play.
That’s how Ross got banishedReally didn't understand the big argument of "If you vote me out and I'm a faithful then it must be X".
She was only right about Rachel. Her other 2 names were wrong and not sure where she got the theory about 4 or 5 traitors from.Really didn't understand the big argument of "If you vote me out and I'm a faithful then it must be X". Her only evidence seemed to be "cos I'm always right". She was correct but all she presented was anecdote and opinion. Aren't barristers supposed to understand evidence.
I had already read about the training on the bbc traitors pages before the first episodeI’m really surprised that nobody called Rachel out at the round table when she announced that she had undergone FBI training before the show so she could profile the other players. Where did she pull thatbomb from?