Theresa May - Not up to the Job of PM?

[Doon frae Troon]

I think Mayhem will show up at the last minute, you must remember that she is strong and stable.

 

[User62651]

Very stressful environment for May I'd think having 5 or 6 political opponents having a pop on live tv, way outside her comfort zone. This is not like the Commons where its all rehearsed beforehand. Many of the participants have done quite a few of these debates before so are well practiced, expect May would come across badly as the incumbent with everything to lose and not much to gain. However not turning up will do nothing for her campaign which has already been panned by all sides as poor. Those voting Tory no matter what wont care but for a lot of undecideds it comes across as aloof and they wont buy the excuse line 'I'm out on doorsteps talking to real people'.
Be interesting to see how Rudd does, suspect a few Tories are eyeing up the top job given May's weakness and election performance to date. Wonder if she (Rudd) offered or was pushed?

Meanwhile Gove will be readying in a kitchen somewhere........ sharpening the knives!

 

[FairwayDodger]

I think Mayhem will show up at the last minute, you must remember that she is strong and stable.

She might change her mind but then would probably change it again... the lady is not for turning up!

 

[SwingsitlikeHogan]

I think Mayhem will show up at the last minute, you must remember that she is strong and stable.

Well it would be another mega u-turn (have we found Mega May) - as she has restated she's a No Show - claiming she prefers to get out and meet the people. What people would that be Dear Leader? The few that your minders let near you in the locations chosen by your minders?

And as far as S&S - don't forget that 'spinning tops' are stable in one place for as long as they keep spinning - but once they stop spinning they fall over, roll about the place, and are then useless.

 

[pokerjoke]

To be honest I'm sick to death of the election as you just cant get an honest answer from most MPs or TM.

How can she wait to after the vote before she gives out some of her policies and how much it will all cost.

I'm sure other parties do the same but the lies and deceit is just driving me mad.

 

[Hacker Khan]

To be honest I'm sick to death of the election as you just cant get an honest answer from most MPs or TM.

How can she wait to after the vote before she gives out some of her policies and how much it will all cost.

I'm sure other parties do the same but the lies and deceit is just driving me mad.

I think she does it as she thinks she can get away with it, says a lot about her attitude and respect she has for the voting public if you ask me. I say make your feelings known at the ballot box

 

[JohnnyDee]

Strong and stable, eh?

That's the stuff to feed the Daily Mail reading wazzocks.

Oh, hang on - even the Tories have twigged they've fooled nobody trying to peddle this utter drivel and have finally stuck a sock in it.

Weak and Wobbly or Timid and Terrified might be the new mantras perhaps? As May swerves every event that's not sanctioned by Central Office.

Still If she can manage to hide away from scrutiny for just another week then she might just get away with it.

 

[SocketRocket]

Strong and stable, eh?

That's the stuff to feed the Daily Mail reading wazzocks.

Oh, hang on - even the Tories have twigged they've fooled nobody trying to peddle this utter drivel and have finally stuck a sock in it.

Weak and Wobbly or Timid and Terrified might be the new mantras perhaps?

Still If May can manage to hide away from scrutiny for just another week then she might just get away with it.

There a a number of people like you on this Forum that continue to rubbish your fellow man by suggesting if they read a certain news paper they are complete idiots. It's pathetic, childish, arrogant and you should take a long look at yourselves.

 

[JohnnyDee]

There a a number of people like you on this Forum that continue to rubbish your fellow man by suggesting if they read a certain news paper they are complete idiots. It's pathetic, childish, arrogant and you should take a long look at yourselves.

Ah yes, of course you're entirely right. What on earth was I thinking about posting such silly nonsense?

Thank you so much for clearing that up for me. :thup:

 

[SocketRocket]

Ah yes, of course you're entirely right. What on earth was I thinking about posting such silly nonsense?

Thank you so much for clearing that up for me. :thup:

No Problem. Any time you start ranting I will let you know, hopefully long term you will be able to control it better. :thup:

 

[JohnnyDee]

No Problem. Any time you start ranting I will let you know, hopefully long term you will be able to control it better. :thup:

Cheers, mate! :thup:

 

[Old Skier]

They do not read what you print.
They pick out about four words from a post, make up their own [mis]interpretation and them start typing whilst in a furious rage.
It's the UKIP/Leave way. Tends to get pretty boring when they keep repeating the same old guff.

Take more than a sock puppet account and the internet to get me into anything like a mere wibble as furious rages passed me by years ago, more like a Scots thing than anything the calm Welsh from the country of Wales would get involved in.

 

[Old Skier]

I think Mayhem will show up at the last minute, you must remember that she is strong and stable.

Is see you once again publish complete rubbish. Your completely out of touch with reality.

 

[ColchesterFC]

I'm not sure that Angus Robertson can get away with making digs about May not being there when he's there instead of Nicola Sturgeon.

I'm not surprised that our SNP supporters on here that have been criticising May for not taking part in the debate haven't been quite so vocal about Sturgeon not being there.

Also not surprised at those congratulating Corbyn on changing his mind and taking part and at the same time saying that if May had done the same it would have been another U turn from her.

Interesting to see such which forummers are happy to publicly display their double standards.

 

[FairwayDodger]

I'm not sure that Angus Robertson can get away with making digs about May not being there when he's there instead of Nicola Sturgeon.

I'm not surprised that our SNP supporters on here that have been criticising May for not taking part in the debate haven't been quite so vocal about Sturgeon not being there.

Also not surprised at those congratulating Corbyn on changing his mind and taking part and at the same time saying that if May had done the same it would have been another U turn from her.

Interesting to see such which forummers are happy to publicly display their double standards.

I'm reluctant to ever give the snp any credit but it seems perfectly logical to have Angus Robertson, their Westminster leader, in the debate rather than sturgeon, who isn't standing for election.

 

[SwingsitlikeHogan]

I'm reluctant to ever give the snp any credit but it seems perfectly logical to have Angus Robertson, their Westminster leader, in the debate rather than sturgeon, who isn't standing for election.

Quite - and rather obvious - if you stop and think about it for a moment or two.

 

[FairwayDodger]

Quite - and rather obvious - if you stop and think about it for a moment or two.

Not the forum's strong suit really!

 

[Old Skier]

Allthough the debate was a shambles and most on here have previously dismissed them I see the double standards are kicking in. Why would you not want all leaders there if that's your thing.

 

[Old Skier]

Quite - and rather obvious - if you stop and think about it for a moment or two.

Absolute tosh, the wee woman knows she is the greatest turn off for the British public. It was a pure personality issue.

 

[SwingsitlikeHogan]

Absolute tosh, the wee woman knows she is the greatest turn off for the British public. It was a pure personality issue.

She has got nothing to do with Westminster - why on earth would she be there? If she had been there you'd have been complaining that she had no right to be there.