It's suspended so no actual ban. A nothing event then.
No reason for Everton or Forest fans to get grumpy
No reason for Everton or Forest fans to get grumpy
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
It's suspended so no actual ban. A nothing event then.
No reason for Everton or Forest fans to get grumpy
Is it under different rules ?
It's fiddling finances and dodgy payments. Personally I'd say that was worse than over spending, it's trying to deceive.
A cynical / bitter fan could argue it's under different rules as somehow rules are judged differently for certain teams. I'm not that cynical or bitter though
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
It's fiddling finances and dodgy payments. Personally I'd say that was worse than over spending, it's trying to deceive.
A cynical / bitter fan could argue it's under different rules as somehow rules are judged differently for certain teams. I'm not that cynical or bitter though
I have no doubt they are scared to go hard on the “big clubs”
PaulMdj
Well-known member
You have to remember that they can use the “new owners” clause.It's fiddling finances and dodgy payments. Personally I'd say that was worse than over spending, it's trying to deceive.
A cynical / bitter fan could argue it's under different rules as somehow rules are judged differently for certain teams. I'm not that cynical or bitter though
irip
Head Pro
Chelsea can afford and are willing to buy their way out of misdemeanours.
Other clubs can’t.
I’ll let you decide which side City fall on.
Neilds
Assistant Pro
You could say (as reported) that they admitted the crime and worked with the authorities - but where is the fun in that?
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Oh well that will be ok with the Everton and Forest fans then - the crime is worse than theirs because it’s pretty much cheating but because they put their hands up and admitted it then the punishment will be irrelevant
Neilds
Assistant Pro
Never said that. Just explained one of the reasons the punishment was less for Chelsea, instead of trying to peddle internet rumours about them buying their way out.
PaulMdj
Well-known member
It was the previous owners! Why wouldn’t the present ones co-operate?
Isn’t that what FSG did?
Bunkermagnet
Journeyman Pro
I think they more than co-operated, they brought it to the attention of the FA.
PaulMdj
Well-known member
Who? Chelsea owners or FSG?
Bunkermagnet
Journeyman Pro
Chelsea's owners. That's what we are talking about aren't we?
PaulMdj
Well-known member
Yes, but I was asking Phil what the issue was.
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Is Dowman the next young player to be hugely hyped belief and massive pressure put on him
The media etc don’t ever learn with these young players
The media etc don’t ever learn with these young players
PaulMdj
Well-known member
Yes, why should the current regime who are trying to do things correctly be punished for bad behaviour by previous owners.Does it matter if it was the previous owners or not
Got to say I’m gobsmacked you’re asking this! It is you that have used the previous owners excuse when people mention LPool getting done.
Orikoru
Tour Winner
Sod that, get him in the World Cup squad! Didn't you see the way he scored that open goal? He can be the next Walcott!
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
The club benefitted from the bad behaviour of Abramovich so yes they should get punished regardless of who now owns the club
What did Liverpool get done for ?
PaulMdj
Well-known member
FFP, have a google
