clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Thatās a red card .
Nobody should interfere with an injured player .
Thatās a red card .
But, we've already had this season, where even VAR has agree the player was offside, but because he was only 5cm offside we'll let it standIf youāre talking about the Burnley match, you should of watched MOTD, they agreed about the handball, but the offside was definitely off.
Ah, sorry , my bad re shoulder/elbow. Apologies.Agree with last paragraph.
In the offside, it was the shoulder, not the elbow (i.e. the shoulder is deemed part of the body an outfield player can use). Still feels really harsh though. Less so if those calls could be made almost instantly, so at least fans know the outcome. Otherwise, too many of us simply dont celebrate until the match kicks off again and goal been clarified.
Daylight, in my view, would make no difference. You can still only either be on or off. It would just move the debate as to whether there was a millimetre of daylight or not, or that someone's toenail closed up any daylight between players
Iād wager the USA wonāt be letting any Iranians enter inc sports teams.From a purely football point of view, I am very intrigued as to whether it will be business as usual when Iran start their World Cup in Los Angeles in a few months time
Scott McTomminayesque
I binned any football with VAR 3 or 4 years ago as I didnāt like the micro management it was doing to the game. Toe nails off side, 3, 4, 5 minutes debating decisions by the same people who make the same mistakes when they are on the field. From what I read, see discussed and hear reactions, it seems in my personal opinion that the system in this country has not got any better in the years it has been in use. I did read that in a recent international tournament, canāt remember which one, that the way VAR was used was being applauded