clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Nomad!You reckon Ally McCoist goes home in-between matches to see his family or just goes from ground to ground?
Nomad!You reckon Ally McCoist goes home in-between matches to see his family or just goes from ground to ground?
Do you think there are better, more qualified officials waiting to be called in to replace them?Just watching the highlights of the Villa v Newcastle game.
It highlights my point re officials and VAR. VAR was brought in because of inept officials.
1, the Villa goal was offside.
2, the keeper sending off was correct.
3, Digne should have been sent off.
4, Digne handled in the box. Should of been a penalty.
Am sure there was more. But that was the worst officiating I have seen for an age. And yet now these officials will be on the pitch next week and they will be let loose in a VAR booth. Shocking.
It's about keeping things consistent. Not sure I entirely agree with that, if you can use it then do so, but I can see the logicThe worst refereeing performance I’ve seen in a long time.
I can understand not using VAR when a lower league team is involved , but surely there is no good reason for not having it when two Prem teams are playing?
Just watching the highlights of the Villa v Newcastle game.
It highlights my point re officials and VAR. VAR was brought in because of inept officials.
1, the Villa goal was offside.
2, the keeper sending off was correct.
3, Digne should have been sent off.
4, Digne handled in the box. Should of been a penalty.
Am sure there was more. But that was the worst officiating I have seen for an age. And yet now these officials will be on the pitch next week and they will be let loose in a VAR booth. Shocking.
@Billysboots very much agree. The key now is to improve its implementation. The concept is good, we need it. It just doesn't work as well as it should. That's where the concentration should be.
I'd have a limit for every decision. Pick a time, 60 seconds, 90 seconds, no more. If you can't see something that makes you change your mind in that time, you stick with the onfield decision.Spot on. Its implementation is the issue. Especially the five minute offside checks. There has to be a time limit - if the offside isn’t obvious then the advantage stays with the attacker.
For me personally i think VAR should only be used for factual decisions.
The biggest problem is the time it often takes to reach a decision and hopefully a way is found to speed that up
There was an offside in the Barca game the other night which took 8 minutes to check!!I'd have a limit for every decision. Pick a time, 60 seconds, 90 seconds, no more. If you can't see something that makes you change your mind in that time, you stick with the onfield decision.
The slowness of the decision making is the biggest gripe for me.
We are able to imagine that world this weekend. And the officials have been slated as a result of it.Imagine a simpler world. No VAR. More importantly no slow motion replays. Only what the officials see. Hell no replays at all.
Bliss...