Bit like cricket? You get an appeal, you keep it if successful?Bin VAR and give a manager 2 appeals per half, they get 30 seconds after an incident to appeal.
Appeal any decision they like, but just 2.
Bit like cricket? You get an appeal, you keep it if successful?Bin VAR and give a manager 2 appeals per half, they get 30 seconds after an incident to appeal.
Appeal any decision they like, but just 2.
That’s the first time I have seen that.
He is looking straight at Digne who not once left the box
That’s nothing but ineptitude
You shouldn’t need appeals to look at factual decisions like offsideBit like cricket? You get an appeal, you keep it if successful?
That’s the first time I have seen that.
I can’t believe they have come to the conclusion that he was outside the area, it’s not close and at no point has ever left the area.
Forget VAR or not that is absolutely horrific officiating.
Again, I find myself chuckling.
So many on here constantly moan about VAR and, when it's not used, moan about the officiating.
How difficult do you think reffing is?
I tried it once, and only once, and that was a kids' match ....................... I found it incredibly difficult.
I'm sure if some of you gave it a try you'd have a bit more empathy.
That non-penalty decision was obviously very poor, but humans make very bad mistakes.
Cole Palmer missed an absolute sitter the other day, but we didn't have page after page of criticism.
I'm happy to give them a bit of slack as I'm eternally grateful that there are people prepared to step into the firing line and actually do the job.
I know I wouldn't ....................................... and I suspect you guys wouldn't.
It's just not worth all the crap they have to put up with.
I wish Shearer, Rooney and Dublin were forced to give it a try and have their efforts picked apart by 'experts' who have never done it before!
AgreedYou shouldn’t need appeals to look at factual decisions like offside
20 seconds is the most it should take....if you cant decide in 20 seconds then its not clear/obvious. If you need multiple camera angles/replays then its not clear/obvious.Spot on. Its implementation is the issue. Especially the five minute offside checks. There has to be a time limit - if the offside isn’t obvious then the advantage stays with the attacker.
This is what they did in the U-17 (19?) World Cup last summer....worked really well. Successful appeal....they kept their "review".Bin VAR and give a manager 2 appeals per half, they get 30 seconds after an incident to appeal.
Appeal any decision they like, but just 2.
This is what they did in the U-17 (19?) World Cup last summer....worked really well. Successful appeal....they kept their "review".
Will Cole Palmer be dropped for missing a sitter? Will he be fined?Var isn’t the issue
The implementation of VAR is the problem
Refs in the professional game get rewarded very well
When players etc make mistakes they suffer the consequences of it - dropped , sold etc
Refs when they make mistakes appear to be made of Teflon -very little consequence and protected
Kavanagh who was in the middle for rhe Newcastle game will be back next week for a Prem game
If he can’t ref to the high standard required then he needs to find a different career - there is no excuse for that performance yesterday
This I believe is a big contributory factor...the officials on the park have forgotten how to stand on their own two feet.I struggle to buy the fact officials are inept. I'm sure there is competition for places at the elite level, and I'm guessing they spend loads (comparative to most other nations) on training and assessment. Potentially, because VAR has been a crutch for so long at elite level, they have lost a bit of ability in having to make the big decisions in the heat of the moment.
We've had VAR in the PL for 6 seasons now...they threw the "clear and obvious" baby out with the bathwater on day 1, and started doing forensic analysis of situations and re-refereeing the game right from the start....and its gone downhill from there leading to the 4/5/6 minute reviews that are now commonplace.“Fifa states that the system "is used only in the event of a possible clear and obvious error, or serious missed incident in relation to the following scenarios, such as goal/no goal, penalty/no penalty or direct red cards (not second cautions)".
It’s those words again - Clear and Obvious
![]()
VAR coach challenges to be trialed in new competitions
The International Football Association Board (IFAB) on Monday approved expanded trials of Football Video Support (FVS), an alternative VAR system which gives coaches the chance to challenge decisions.www.espn.co.uk
The thing is BB, in the previous round we were applauding the football and officials without the use of VAR. Some of those decisions yesterday were atrocious at the very least.What it shows, sadly, is that for all the controversy VAR attracts, top level football can no longer operate without it.
I hate VAR with a passion. It ruins the game as a spectacle, especially for the match going fan. It’s a mechanism via which inept officials in the VAR booth cover up for the mistakes of equally inept officials on the ground, and its use has allowed those on the ground to get progressively worse, as we saw last night.
But what last night also demonstrated in glorious clarity is that we are now well and truly stuck with it.