clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
I’ve had a word and it’s I was RIGHT.Two yards? Have a word.
SEE IMAGE POSTED BY TASH.
I’ve had a word and it’s I was RIGHT.Two yards? Have a word.
Look at the point where Haaland plays the pass. That’s not when Tash’s pic was taken. And don’t shout.I’ve had a word and it’s I was RIGHT.
SEE IMAGE POSTED BY TASH.
Oh dear. If reports on Sky Sports News are in any way accurate, unless Erik Ten Hag holds clear the air talks with his entire squad very soon, his days may be numbered.
The suggestion is as many as half his squad are deeply unhappy with his management style, training methods and so on.
Groundhog Day and another management change on the horizon, methinks.
Shifting the dead wood would leave them with about six players.It’s a tough one Billy. Is it prima Donna players or is it a poor manager? Or is it a bit of both?
Changing the manager won’t change Martial, Rashford or Sancho. But getting rid of disruptive players might lighten the mood in the squad. And let’s be honest, several of the players haven’t performed for previous manager(s).
I’d go with shifting on the deadwood first, otherwise the next manager inherits the same problem.
It’s a tough one Billy. Is it prima Donna players or is it a poor manager? Or is it a bit of both?
Changing the manager won’t change Martial, Rashford or Sancho. But getting rid of disruptive players might lighten the mood in the squad. And let’s be honest, several of the players haven’t performed for previous manager(s).
I’d go with shifting on the deadwood first, otherwise the next manager inherits the same problem.
I think the point you have missed is the fact they have said “ it is accepted there was human error”. What that means is that the last 6 pages of us discussing this whether we agreed or not With the decision is now irrelevant. The powers that be have said “ human error”. Now if you go back a few of my posts I said it would be nice to get a response to yesterday. We haveJesus, I didn't think there was ever a chance of him being stood down. Just for missing the chance to give advantage while correctly awarding a foul??
Better replay the match tbh.
Who would you likeOh dear. If reports on Sky Sports News are in any way accurate, unless Erik Ten Hag holds clear the air talks with his entire squad very soon, his days may be numbered.
The suggestion is as many as half his squad are deeply unhappy with his management style, training methods and so on.
Groundhog Day and another management change on the horizon, methinks.
It’s a tough one Billy. Is it prima Donna players or is it a poor manager? Or is it a bit of both?
Changing the manager won’t change Martial, Rashford or Sancho. But getting rid of disruptive players might lighten the mood in the squad. And let’s be honest, several of the players haven’t performed for previous manager(s).
I’d go with shifting on the deadwood first, otherwise the next manager inherits the same problem.
Who would you like![]()
I think the point you have missed is the fact they have said “ it is accepted there was human error”. What that means is that the last 6 pages of us discussing this whether we agreed or not With the decision is now irrelevant. The powers that be have said “ human error”. Now if you go back a few of my posts I said it would be nice to get a response to yesterday. We haveThat has shocked me. So we move on. So let’s not over react.
However, City have now been charged for surrounding the ref after his “ human error mistake”.
Me I hope it gets put with the 115 other charges![]()
Wasn't there an article floating about recently saying Ratcliffe wanted to tell ETH to make it up with Sancho and bring him back into the team?It’s a really difficult one. We see the managerial merry go round at Chelsea, and that never seems to solve the problem at Stamford Bridge. I’m really reluctant to see United going down the same route, but something really has to change.
I hate seeing the tail wagging the dog. Absolutely hate it. Player power is too great, and shouldn’t be allowed to dictate a club’s direction, especially when it comes to hiring and firing managers.
But equally, if a manager has lost a huge proportion of the dressing room, then it seems difficult to see how that manager’s position remains tenable.
A good manager has to be flexible in their dealings with staff. A one size fits all approach is dangerous when dealing with diverse personalities. And it strikes me that this may be part of the issue with ETH - his disciplinarian approach does not seem to be working with everyone. I’m reminded of how Ferguson used to manage Cantona - the player allegedly used to be given considerably more latitude than many of his colleagues because of the complex nature of his personality. The other players accepted it because they saw the considerable benefits. Maybe ETH doesn’t operate the same way, who knows?
If he is unable to salvage the situation, if such a situation exists, then much as it pains me to say it he may need to go. But if he does move on, then simultaneously the club need to make real strides in identifying those players who either down tools too easily, or who are disruptive, and move them on as well. We cannot find ourselves in a cycle of rinse and repeat.
Read the post I was disscussing .Look at the point where Haaland plays the pass. That’s not when Tash’s pic was taken. And don’t shout.
Think most people could see that coming!Oh dear. If reports on Sky Sports News are in any way accurate, unless Erik Ten Hag holds clear the air talks with his entire squad very soon, his days may be numbered.
The suggestion is as many as half his squad are deeply unhappy with his management style, training methods and so on.
Groundhog Day and another management change on the horizon, methinks.
Pep came out and admitted mistakes were made.I think the point you have missed is the fact they have said “ it is accepted there was human error”. What that means is that the last 6 pages of us discussing this whether we agreed or not With the decision is now irrelevant. The powers that be have said “ human error”. Now if you go back a few of my posts I said it would be nice to get a response to yesterday. We haveThat has shocked me. So we move on. So let’s not over react.
However, City have now been charged for surrounding the ref after his “ human error mistake”.
Me I hope it gets put with the 115 other charges![]()
Should be a point for every player around the ref.I think the point you have missed is the fact they have said “ it is accepted there was human error”. What that means is that the last 6 pages of us discussing this whether we agreed or not With the decision is now irrelevant. The powers that be have said “ human error”. Now if you go back a few of my posts I said it would be nice to get a response to yesterday. We haveThat has shocked me. So we move on. So let’s not over react.
However, City have now been charged for surrounding the ref after his “ human error mistake”.
Me I hope it gets put with the 115 other charges![]()
Given what you have said here.It’s a really difficult one. We see the managerial merry go round at Chelsea, and that never seems to solve the problem at Stamford Bridge. I’m really reluctant to see United going down the same route, but something really has to change.
I hate seeing the tail wagging the dog. Absolutely hate it. Player power is too great, and shouldn’t be allowed to dictate a club’s direction, especially when it comes to hiring and firing managers.
But equally, if a manager has lost a huge proportion of the dressing room, then it seems difficult to see how that manager’s position remains tenable.
A good manager has to be flexible in their dealings with staff. A one size fits all approach is dangerous when dealing with diverse personalities. And it strikes me that this may be part of the issue with ETH - his disciplinarian approach does not seem to be working with everyone. I’m reminded of how Ferguson used to manage Cantona - the player allegedly used to be given considerably more latitude than many of his colleagues because of the complex nature of his personality. The other players accepted it because they saw the considerable benefits. Maybe ETH doesn’t operate the same way, who knows?
If he is unable to salvage the situation, if such a situation exists, then much as it pains me to say it he may need to go. But if he does move on, then simultaneously the club need to make real strides in identifying those players who either down tools too easily, or who are disruptive, and move them on as well. We cannot find ourselves in a cycle of rinse and repeat.
Given what you have said here.
What top manager would want the job given the squad is so toxic ?
Will he be blamed just like ETH.
You may not have much choice!