Burnley fans are not on a good run.![]()
Aston Villa team bus hit by brick after win at Burnley
Aston Villa's team bus is attacked following the game at Burnley, causing significant damage but no injuries.www.bbc.co.uk
not good at all
Burnley fans are not on a good run.![]()
Aston Villa team bus hit by brick after win at Burnley
Aston Villa's team bus is attacked following the game at Burnley, causing significant damage but no injuries.www.bbc.co.uk
not good at all
14 points behind me and I've got no Haaland......Fantasy League annoying me already. I've had Nunez in my team since day 1 as I thought he would have a good season. They don't bloody play him. So of course he was on my bench this week and won't get in the team. Typical. A score of 23 for the week with 18 wasted points on the bench.![]()
Fantasy League annoying me already. I've had Nunez in my team since day 1 as I thought he would have a good season. They don't bloody play him. So of course he was on my bench this week and won't get in the team. Typical. A score of 23 for the week with 18 wasted points on the bench.![]()
I guess the 14 injuries in 5 years won’t helpDo we have any Arsenal fans left? Tierney has gone on loan to Real Sociedad. I really like him as a player, has he had injury troubles, loss of form or does Arteta just not rate him.
If it's just the latter, why has no other club come in for him?
That's a big shame for him. Hopefully he will get a bit of luck and stay injury free for a spell.I guess the 14 injuries in 5 years won’t help
I’m all for sorting out the time wasting and back chatting to the ref etc but they still need to actually punish the fouls and the consistent fouling
No idea how Newcastle didn’t get more in the book
Joelinton 4 fouls - 3 were for going through the back off players and within a 9 min period - it also didn’t include the fouls were play was allowed to continue
Joe Linton should have been booked. But it gets awfully complicated if you start looking at discriminating between 4 nudges and 2 hacks. There will always be an element of subjectivity, there’s just no easy way to nail it down. That’s when it becomes contentious. One fan will say, “send him off,” and the next will say, “he didn’t touch him.”
The back chatting needs jumping on. Liverpool players mobbed the ref when VVD got his red. That shouldn’t happen. At best, it should only be the captain, or vice if it’s the captain getting the red. I’m all for saying, “mob me and your captain gets sent off.” No player wants to be responsible for getting their captain sent off. Rugby Union refs used to say it when I was playing - it works. Teams police themselves.
Maybe they thought he had a bet on himself to get booked and concede a penalty in the game...Joelinton went through the back of the player about 3 times - but it was consistent fouling from both him and his midfield partner that went unpunished but yellow cards being given to Nunez and TAA for kicking/throwing the ball away - the ref has to be consistent and from the first minute after missing the blatant foul on TAA it was always going to be an interesting time
The surrounding of the ref etc was supposed to be stopped ages ago - same with the asking for bookings - first week both yellow cards dished out but it didn’t last long as we saw last week in the Arsenal match , and even in the game you could see Trippier sprinting across the pitch twice to shout at the ref to send off TAA and VVD
The referee’s this season seem even worse than any other season - and VAR is missing a lot , look at the Paqueta push in the penalty area in the Brighton game , I can’t understand how they see it and don’t do anything
Also not sure how both at Tindall and Howe were allowed to stand together at the edge of the technical area as it’s only supposed to be one now
Ultimate piece of optimism from a Hammers mate this weekend - he claimed West Ham were both champions of Europe and top of the Premier League on Saturday evening![]()
Well he was factually correct![]()
No he wasn’t?
It’s the declarative clause. By wording it as a question I’m both showing that I don’t believe the claim to be true and asking why the person believes it.Isn't that a statement, rather than a question?
If so, why the question mark?
It’s the declarative clause. By wording it as a question I’m both showing that I don’t believe the claim to be true and asking why the person believes it.
I should have included a comma after no. That’s the grammatical error you should’ve pointed out.