Swango1980
Well-known member
I get your point, but I agree with Billysboots as well.One for the Utd fans. I keep hearing about this player is best in that position, that player is best in that position. Now don’t get me wrong watching City. You could be playing 433 but whoever finds himself out wide right does not always stay there. They could be anywhere. They are very fluid. Now that has come Down to coaching. Is that not in the Utd locker to be able to move from A Designated position on the pitch.
Rashford strength is his pace, and attacking from the left. It enables him to run in from the left, and potentially shoot with his strongest foot (assuming he hasn't already made the wrong decision before then and fallen over when trying a step over). Bit like Henry's strength was in the same position, and as such would often find himself there. Of course, he was also free to change position in the match depending on what was happening.
Therefore, players will have their strongest positions, and the coach needs to get that balance right. However, teams also need to adapt and be flexible during the game. Where players may change to a different position, before going back to their primary role. However, this also takes coaching, and a good understanding between the players. If you just assume players will figure it out for themselves with no plan, inevitably some will run about like headless chickens, while others will rigidly stick to their primary position. Basically a big mess, and it often it feels that way watching Utd. Sometimes it looks like we've 4 strikers, no wingers, no attacking midfielders, 2 defensive midfielders and 4 defenders. If Shaw and Wan Bissaka charge forward, we can have maybe 2 centre backs and one midfielder in defensive duty, and 7 players flat out attack (but struggling if opposition are playing deep). It is no wonder it only takes 2 or 3 opponents to hurt us on the counter.