Awful decision by Moyes and shows a lack of faith in Rice. Hope he holds his hands up to that. Also hope Noble hangs his boots up tonight, he’s hanging around the place like a bad smell. “club Captain”?
The first one was never a penalty the second one was.
I was disappointed for West Ham thought they deserved a draw, Rice made me laugh after he made that long burst at the end he looked absolutely knackered when he walked back, only 22 and he’s very impressive
Would you day the same about corners, free kicks, throw ins and kick offs?I’m surprised nobody has raised the issue of players having to be on a pitch when a penalty is awarded to actually take it.
Personally, I’m really not comfortable with a club being allowed to use a sub specifically for the purpose of taking a penalty already awarded. It’s bordering on special teams tactics that I used to see in American Football when I followed it years ago.
By all means bring on a ‘keeper with a shootout on the horizon, or penalty takers for the same reason (notwithstanding the fact it doesn’t always pay off ?). But West Ham being awarded a penalty and being allowed to bring Noble on for him to take it just doesn’t sit right. It should be taken by a player who was on the pitch when the spot kick was actually awarded.
I’m surprised nobody has raised the issue of players having to be on a pitch when a penalty is awarded to actually take it.
Personally, I’m really not comfortable with a club being allowed to use a sub specifically for the purpose of taking a penalty already awarded. It’s bordering on special teams tactics that I used to see in American Football when I followed it years ago.
By all means bring on a ‘keeper with a shootout on the horizon, or penalty takers for the same reason (notwithstanding the fact it doesn’t always pay off ?). But West Ham being awarded a penalty and being allowed to bring Noble on for him to take it just doesn’t sit right. It should be taken by a player who was on the pitch when the spot kick was actually awarded.
Would you day the same about corners, free kicks, throw ins and kick offs?
I’m surprised nobody has raised the issue of players having to be on a pitch when a penalty is awarded to actually take it.
Personally, I’m really not comfortable with a club being allowed to use a sub specifically for the purpose of taking a penalty already awarded. It’s bordering on special teams tactics that I used to see in American Football when I followed it years ago.
By all means bring on a ‘keeper with a shootout on the horizon, or penalty takers for the same reason (notwithstanding the fact it doesn’t always pay off ?). But West Ham being awarded a penalty and being allowed to bring Noble on for him to take it just doesn’t sit right. It should be taken by a player who was on the pitch when the spot kick was actually awarded.
The problem is, substitutions are made when play has stopped. throw ins, free kicks, corners and penalties.
I get that, Tash, but an oncoming substitute’s very first involvement should not, in my view, be to take a penalty just awarded.
Just my opinion.
Sentiment? I think the issue might've been nobody else in your side can take a penalty. Still an awful decision though, when will managers learn it's not easy to walk onto a pitch stone cold and bury a penalty with your first kick?Worst decision Moyes has ever made for us
Sentiment has no place in football
The first one was never a penalty the second one was.
I was disappointed for West Ham thought they deserved a draw, Rice made me laugh after he made that long burst at the end he looked absolutely knackered when he walked back, only 22 and he’s very impressive
Sentiment? I think the issue might've been nobody else in your side can take a penalty. Still an awful decision though, when will managers learn it's not easy to walk onto a pitch stone cold and bury a penalty with your first kick?
Not on my telly, not even close!
We're you borrowing Phil's glasses.
No real need to make a rule for it when it basically never works! We saw at the Euros and we've seen it before with Vardy against Spurs a while back.I’m surprised nobody has raised the issue of players having to be on a pitch when a penalty is awarded to actually take it.
Personally, I’m really not comfortable with a club being allowed to use a sub specifically for the purpose of taking a penalty already awarded. It’s bordering on special teams tactics that I used to see in American Football when I followed it years ago.
By all means bring on a ‘keeper with a shootout on the horizon, or penalty takers for the same reason (notwithstanding the fact it doesn’t always pay off ?). But West Ham being awarded a penalty and being allowed to bring Noble on for him to take it just doesn’t sit right. It should be taken by a player who was on the pitch when the spot kick was actually awarded.
I think it’s great. Twice now this year it’s made me very happy. ?I get that, Tash, but an oncoming substitute’s very first involvement should not, in my view, be to take a penalty just awarded.
Just my opinion.
The interviewer I just saw said that you'd missed 4 of your last 5 or something, but Moyes claimed he wasn't thinking about that, just Noble's record of scoring them. ??Na it was sentiment, last min in his last season
We have had pens before and he hasn't come on
Rice can take them
Soucek has a brilliant record
Yarmeleko aswell
Noble was pure get him on and give him a goal
The interviewer I just saw said that you'd missed 4 of your last 5 or something, but Moyes claimed he wasn't thinking about that, just Noble's record of scoring them. ??