Tashyboy
Please don’t ask to see my tatts 👍
Brew House on Trent bridge. basically we told them to shove it. It started raining as we got to Trent bridge so we popped into Brew house. A pal asks for a pint and the barman said “ we don’t have that”. So my pal just turned the sign round on the pump. The guy said “ the company don’t like us to turn them around”. And he turned I back. my pal said “ if it was turned around I wouldn’t have asked for it as I would have known you had none”. He shrugged his shoulders. I. Asked for a pint of American IPA. The barman said “ we don’t have any of that either”. I asked “ would it be easier to tell us what you have or what you don’t have”. I turned to my pal and said “ this isn’t the only pub in Notts so we went to the one I mentioned.
Trent navigation (across the road and down the side street opposite embankment towards Meadow Lane) is my go to on match days but all the pubs around there have a good buzz about them.
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Give them £30mil and it’s a dealNo just value for money.
On that basis United are paying Betis £25 million
clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
That’s a really great finish from the lad.
That’s poor from VAR it’s the Chelsea player going to ground and out of control.
Where’s his foot supposed to go?
That’s poor from VAR it’s the Chelsea player going to ground and out of control.
Where’s his foot supposed to go?
Last edited:
Lucifer MorningStar
Well-known member
That’s a joke of a decision. That’s not a careless challenge he dragged the ball back where’s he meant to put his feet in thin air!
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
That’s a very soft decision and that shouldn’t be sent to VAR imo
And as for the explanation after - poor
Watching it again , that’s really poor
And as for the explanation after - poor
Watching it again , that’s really poor
Don Barzini
Assistant Pro
Another Saturday, another VAR controversy.
Bazz
Q-School Graduate
Look how we've allowed them to ruin the game. Any little thing used to rule out goals. That's never ever a foul.
clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Big Six decision there maybe?
Bazz
Q-School Graduate
And they can get rid of the explanation from the ref nonsense too. Americanisation creeping in.
The only the thing the ref has explained to me there is that he's even worse than I thought.
The only the thing the ref has explained to me there is that he's even worse than I thought.
clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Bazz
Q-School Graduate
Been a decent game but all about the ref again
They love it, and got even more chance to be the main man now.
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
They are always looking for something to rule a goal out - it’s really poor
irip
Head Pro
I think now we have tried VAR my opinion would be to keep it for anything factual.
Offside
Mistaken identity
Ball in/out of play.
For anything that’s an opinion let the onfield ref decide.
Offside
Mistaken identity
Ball in/out of play.
For anything that’s an opinion let the onfield ref decide.
clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
He’s done him with a bit of skill but Chelsea player puts his foot where he lands .
How is that careless.?
How is that careless.?
Bazz
Q-School Graduate
A good time to remind everyone that one club voted to get rid of VAR but got outvoted 19-1....and that club won't have to deal with it next season.
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
It’s poor marking and a good finish but after 9 mins of injury time , don’t blame the Fulham manager for being unhappy here
And does Chelsea’s tunnel really say world champions
And does Chelsea’s tunnel really say world champions
clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Speaks volumes when the ref needs a security detail to get down the tunnel.
Great game shame about the officials!
Great game shame about the officials!
irip
Head Pro
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
They are going to give this as well - the player can’t do anything else but have the arms like that when jumping to block
Edit - can’t give this as it’s hit Pedro on the hand first
Edit - can’t give this as it’s hit Pedro on the hand first
